Workmates Core2Cloud passes all four resolutions at 8th AGM
- All four resolutions passed at Workmates Core2Cloud's 8th AGM held on September 25, 2026
- Voting turnout declined from 76.68% for financial statements to 62.93% for remuneration issues
- A consistent block of 9,600 votes opposed director reappointment and remuneration revisions
- Meeting conducted via video conferencing with zero physical attendance recorded

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Workmates Core2Cloud Solution Limited passed all four resolutions proposed at its eighth Annual General Meeting held on September 25, 2026. The meeting was conducted via video conferencing and other audio-visual means, with voting results disclosed to the exchange on September 26, 2026.
The resolutions covered the adoption of audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026, the reappointment of a director, and revisions in remuneration for two key managerial personnel. The scrutinizer’s report confirmed that all items were approved by shareholders through remote e-voting.
Voting participation and quorum
The company reported that no shareholders attended the meeting physically or through proxies. Instead, 18 participants joined via video conferencing: eight from the promoter group and ten from the public category. The record date for determining entitlement to vote was September 18, 2026, with a total of 1,058 shareholders on the register.
Voting was conducted exclusively through remote e-voting facilitated by National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL). The facility was open from September 22 to September 24, 2026. No votes were cast through physical poll or postal ballot during the meeting itself.
Resolution outcomes
All four resolutions received majority support. The first resolution, an ordinary resolution regarding the adoption of financial statements, saw 99,06,700 votes in favor and zero against. This represented 76.68% of the total outstanding shares voting on this item.
The subsequent three resolutions involved lower participation rates but still secured overwhelming approval. Notably, one shareholder cast 9,600 votes against each of the last three resolutions, which pertained to director reappointment and remuneration revisions.
| Resolution | Type | Votes in Favour | Votes Against | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adoption of FY26 Financials | Ordinary | 99,06,700 | 0 | Passed |
| Reappointment of Debasish Sarkar | Ordinary | 81,20,652 | 9,600 | Passed |
| Remuneration of Debasish Sarkar | Special | 81,20,652 | 9,600 | Passed |
| Remuneration of Basanta Kumar Rana | Special | 81,20,652 | 9,600 | Passed |
What the numbers show
A distinct pattern emerges when comparing voting turnout across the four agenda items. Participation dropped significantly after the first resolution. While 76.68% of outstanding shares voted on the financial statements, only 62.93% participated in the votes concerning director reappointment and remuneration. This suggests that some shareholders who engaged with the core financial disclosures chose not to vote on the governance and compensation matters, despite the latter being special resolutions requiring higher thresholds of approval.
Furthermore, the dissenting voice remained consistent across the three related-party sensitive items. Exactly 9,600 votes were cast against the reappointment of Mr. Debasish Sarkar and the remuneration revisions for both Mr. Sarkar and Mr. Basanta Kumar Rana. This indicates a single shareholder or a small bloc of aligned investors expressing uniform opposition to the management's compensation and tenure decisions, while supporting the broader financial reporting.
Historical Stock Returns for Workmates Core2Cloud Solution
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.74% | -3.10% | +25.21% | +31.91% | +12.55% | +12.55% |
How will the 14% drop in voting participation for governance resolutions compared to financial adoption impact future shareholder engagement strategies?
What specific changes to the remuneration packages of Debasish Sarkar and Basanta Kumar Rana were approved, and how do they align with industry benchmarks?
Will the consistent dissent from a single shareholder bloc on compensation matters trigger further scrutiny from institutional investors or regulatory bodies?

































