Wisner Baum Named Co-Lead Counsel in Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator MDL

scanx
Reviewed by
Shriram SScanX News Team
Key Highlights
  • Behram V. Parekh appointed Co-Lead Counsel in Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator MDL No. 3181
  • Hannah Quicksell named to Leadership Development Committee for coordinated discovery phase
  • Plaintiffs allege device failures and insufficient clinical trials for post-approval modifications
  • Consolidation of cases against Abbott and Nevro scheduled for September 24 hearing consideration
powered bylight_fuzz_icon
49724548

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Wisner Baum LLP attorneys have been appointed to key leadership roles in the multidistrict litigation concerning Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulators. The appointments mark a shift from individual filings to coordinated federal proceedings.

Behram V. Parekh, a partner at the firm’s Los Angeles office, has been named one of three Co-Lead Counsel in Boston Scientific Corporation Spinal Cord Stimulator Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 3181. Associate attorney Hannah Quicksell was appointed to the litigation’s Leadership Development Committee.

Federal Coordination Begins

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation established MDL No. 3181 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The cases are pending before U.S. District Judge Josephine L. Staton.

As Co-Lead Counsel, Parekh will coordinate plaintiffs’ pretrial activities, develop the litigation plan, and manage common-issue and bellwether discovery. Quicksell and other committee members will work with senior leadership on litigation projects and participate in court presentations.

Regulatory and Safety Allegations

Plaintiffs allege that spinal cord stimulators failed to deliver promised pain relief and caused injuries including painful electrical shocks, worsening pain, and neurological symptoms. The lawsuits also challenge how manufacturers modified devices after original U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals.

Attorneys argue that manufacturers made extensive changes to software, firmware, battery systems, and stimulation patterns through the FDA’s premarket approval supplement process without conducting new clinical trials to evaluate cumulative effects.

Broader Industry Scrutiny

The Boston Scientific MDL addresses one portion of broader spinal cord stimulator litigation. Attorneys are seeking to consolidate federal cases against Abbott and Nevro. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation is scheduled to consider those requests at a September 24 hearing.

Parekh noted that if additional cases are coordinated, the litigation could provide a broader look at practices across the spinal cord stimulation industry, examining evidence supporting devices, post-implantation risks, and information provided to patients.

Disclaimer: This article is AI-generated using data from ViewTrade. ScanX is not liable for any inaccuracies.

How might the outcome of the September 24 hearing regarding Abbott and Nevro consolidation impact the total settlement value and timeline of the spinal cord stimulator litigation?

What potential regulatory changes could the FDA implement in response to allegations that manufacturers modified device software and firmware without new clinical trials?

How will the appointment of Co-Lead Counsel influence the selection and strategy for upcoming bellwether trials in MDL No. 3181?

like19
dislike

Boston Scientific reports global disruptions after cybersecurity incident

scanx
Reviewed by
Naman SScanX News Team
Key Highlights
  • Boston Scientific identified a cybersecurity incident on August 25, 2026, disrupting global operations
  • System access limitations are affecting the processing and shipping of customer orders
  • The company reported quarterly revenue of $5.442 billion, beating estimates of $5.361 billion
  • Shares fell 4.32% to $47.70 as the investigation into the breach continues
powered bylight_fuzz_icon
49285565

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Boston Scientific Corporation (NYSE: BSX) identified a cybersecurity incident on August 25, 2026, causing global operational disruptions. The breach limits access to systems critical for processing and shipping customer orders.

The company activated its incident response plan and engaged third-party cybersecurity experts to contain the threat. In a Wednesday SEC filing, Boston Scientific noted that system access remains limited and the timeline for full restoration is currently unknown.

Operational Impact

The incident has disrupted key operational aspects, specifically limiting the ability to process and ship customer orders. These limitations are expected to continue as the investigation proceeds. The company has not determined whether the incident is reasonably likely to have a material impact on the company.

Recent Financial Context

Amid the cyber incident, Boston Scientific reported revenues of $5.442 billion for the recent quarter, beating the consensus estimate of $5.361 billion and management guidance of $5.34 billion-$5.44 billion. However, the company had previously cut its fiscal 2026 outlook, citing pressures in the Watchman and EP markets.

Boston Scientific shares were down 4.32% at $47.70 at the time of publication on Wednesday.

Disclaimer: This article is AI-generated using data from ViewTrade. ScanX is not liable for any inaccuracies.

How might the ongoing disruption to order processing and shipping impact Boston Scientific's revenue guidance for the next fiscal quarter?

What are the potential long-term reputational risks for Boston Scientific in the medical device sector following this breach, and could it affect hospital procurement decisions?

Will the company need to allocate significant capital expenditures from its operational budget to enhance cybersecurity infrastructure, potentially impacting future R&D spending?

like17
dislike

More News on Boston Scientific