Vikran Engineering receives ₹5.34 Cr GST demand notice for FY23
- Received GST demand cum show cause notice of ₹5.34 crore for FY 2022-23
- Penalty of ₹53.44 lakh levied alongside the tax demand by CGST Patna-I
- Alleged violations include GSTR-2A/3B mismatches and RCM non-payment
- Company states no material impact on financial or operational activities

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Vikran Engineering Limited received a GST demand cum show cause notice totaling ₹5.34 crore from the CGST & CX authority in Patna-I, relating to the fiscal year 2022-23. The notice was issued on September 22, 2026, under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017.
The regulatory filing, submitted to stock exchanges on September 23, 2026, details that the tax demand raised amounts to ₹5,34,45,785, with an additional penalty of ₹53,44,579 levied. The authorities cited discrepancies between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B returns, non-payment of tax on a reverse charge mechanism (RCM) basis, and turnover differences regarding TDS supplies as the primary grounds for the action.
Nature of the Regulatory Action
The Office of the Additional Commissioner, CGST & CX, Patna-I, issued the notice in Form GST DRC-01. The company has acknowledged receipt and stated its intention to respond within the specified time period. Despite the significant quantum of the demand relative to typical small-cap operational scales, Vikran Engineering asserted that it does not foresee any material impact on its financial or operational activities.
| Particulars | Details |
|---|---|
| Authority | Office of the Additional Commissioner, CGST & CX, Patna-I |
| Period Involved | FY 2022-23 |
| Tax Demand | ₹5,34,45,785 |
| Penalty | ₹53,44,579 |
| Total Exposure | ₹5,87,90,364 |
| Date of Receipt | September 22, 2026 |
What the Numbers Show
The total financial exposure disclosed in the notice is approximately ₹5.88 crore, comprising the primary tax demand and the associated penalty. A notable pattern in the source data is the penalty structure: the penalty amount of ₹53,44,579 represents exactly 10% of the principal tax demand of ₹5,34,45,785. This precise ratio suggests the authorities may have applied a standard penalty calculation method often seen in initial show cause notices under Section 73, rather than a discretionary higher penalty, which could imply the case is at an early procedural stage pending the company's response.
Historical Stock Returns for Vikran Engineering
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.37% | +1.08% | -10.95% | -7.83% | -48.87% | -41.34% |
How will Vikran Engineering's specific rebuttal regarding the GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B discrepancies influence the final adjudication outcome under Section 73?
What is the potential impact on Vikran Engineering's working capital and liquidity ratios if the ₹5.88 crore demand is upheld before the appeal process concludes?
Does this notice signal a broader regulatory tightening by CGST authorities in Patna-I targeting small-cap engineering firms for RCM compliance gaps?


































