Uno Minda receives ₹1.14 Cr tax demand from Pune VAT for FY16-18
- Uno Minda received a net tax demand of ₹1.13 crore from Pune VAT authorities
- Demand relates to Central Sales Tax declarations for FY2016 through FY2018
- Components include tax, penalty, and interest totaling over ₹1.15 crore gross
- Company plans to contest the order and expects no material operational impact

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Uno Minda Limited has received a net tax demand of ₹1.13 crore from the Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Pune, regarding Central Sales Tax declarations for FY2016 to FY2018.
The company disclosed this development in a filing with stock exchanges on September 24, 2026, under Regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The demand pertains to the non-submission or short submission of declaration forms under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Breakdown of the Tax Demand
The total liability comprises tax, penalty, and interest, offset by amounts already paid by the company. The specific components of the demand are detailed below:
| Component | Amount |
|---|---|
| Tax | ₹27,95,784 |
| Penalty | ₹27,95,784 |
| Interest | ₹59,55,156 |
| Less: Already Paid | (₹1,74,339) |
| Net Demand | ₹1,13,72,385 |
Company Response and Impact
Uno Minda stated that it intends to contest the said order based on merits. The company asserted that it does not foresee any material impact on its financial, operational, or other activities resulting from this demand.
The order was received at 5:42 pm IST on September 24, 2026. The disclosure was signed by Tarun Kumar Srivastava, Company Secretary and Compliance Officer.
Historical Stock Returns for UNO Minda
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.52% | +1.08% | -2.66% | +13.68% | -6.94% | +230.89% |
How might the outcome of Uno Minda's legal challenge influence compliance standards for other auto component manufacturers regarding historical GST and CST filings?
Could this tax demand signal a broader pattern of retrospective scrutiny by state tax authorities on auto sector companies for pre-GST era transactions?
What are the potential implications for Uno Minda's credit rating or borrowing costs if the tax dispute escalates beyond the current ₹1.13 crore demand?


































