Tradewell Holdings AGM approves director pay; promoter votes invalid
- Tradewell Holdings AGM passed all four agenda items with over 99% assent
- Promoter votes totaling 21,98,400 declared invalid on remuneration resolutions
- Kamal Manchanda's remuneration of ₹18,00,000 ratified for FY26 and approved for FY27
- Procedural lapse in shareholder approval for Schedule V payments regularised

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Tradewell Holdings Limited held its 32nd Annual General Meeting on September 30, 2026, in Delhi. The meeting addressed critical governance matters, including the ratification of managerial remuneration paid during the financial year 2025-26 despite inadequate profits.
The company’s statutory auditor and secretarial auditor flagged that while the remuneration paid to directors was within the limits prescribed under Schedule V of the Companies Act, 2013, the requisite prior approval from shareholders had not been obtained due to administrative oversight. Consequently, the management proposed ordinary and special resolutions to regularise this payment and seek retrospective approval for amounts exceeding Section 197 limits.
Voting results and scrutiny
Parveen Rastogi & Co., appointed as the scrutinizer, submitted the consolidated report on October 3, 2026. The report confirmed that all four agenda items were passed with the requisite majority. Voting was conducted exclusively through remote e-voting via the National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL) platform; no polling papers were received at the meeting venue.
A total of 62 members cast their votes electronically. The scrutiny process was conducted in the presence of two witnesses who are not employees of the company. The register and records related to the voting remain in the scrutinizer's custody until the Chairman approves the minutes.
Resolution outcomes and remuneration details
The following table details the voting outcome for each resolution passed at the AGM:
| Agenda Item | Type | Assent (%) | Dissent (%) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adoption of Financials | Ordinary Resolution | 99.9998% | 0.0002% | Passed |
| Re-appointment of Director | Ordinary Resolution | 99.9998% | 0.0002% | Passed |
| Ratification of Remuneration | Ordinary Resolution | 99.9998% | 0.0002% | Passed |
| Excess Remuneration | Special Resolution | 99.9998% | 0.0002% | Passed |
For the first two items (Adoption of Financials and Re-appointment of Mr. Kamal Manchanda), all 62 members voted validly. However, for the remuneration-related items (Items 3 and 4), the total number of valid votes cast dropped to 57 members. This reduction occurred because 5 members, representing 21,98,400 votes, had their votes declared invalid. Despite these invalid votes, the assent percentage remained at 99.9998% among valid votes, ensuring the resolutions were carried out.
The specific remuneration details disclosed for Whole-time Director Kamal Manchanda are as follows:
| Particulars | Agenda Item 3 | Agenda Item 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Nature of approval | Ratification of FY26 pay | Approval of future pay |
| Remuneration | ₹18,00,000 | ₹18,00,000 |
| Period | FY26 | FY27 and balance tenure |
| Reason | Inadequate profits | Exceeds Section 197 limit |
Governance and compliance observations
The auditor’s report highlighted a specific observation regarding Section 197(16) of the Companies Act, 2013. The report noted that during the financial year, the company had inadequate profits. Although the managerial remuneration was within Schedule V limits, the procedural requirement for shareholder approval was missed before the close of the fiscal year. The management clarified that this was due to oversight and confirmed that steps were initiated to place the matter before members for approval at this AGM.
The secretarial audit report echoed these concerns, stating that the necessary approval of members regarding such remuneration was required to be obtained. The company ensured compliance by including these items in the AGM agenda, allowing shareholders to vote via remote e-voting or ballot at the venue.
Meeting proceedings and attendance
Mr. Kamal Manchanda, Whole-Time Director, chaired the meeting after being elected by the members. The quorum was present with 32 members attending in person. Other directors present included Mrs. Aruna Manchanda (Non-Executive Director) and Ms. Shilpy Chopra (Non-Executive Independent Director). Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh served as Chief Financial Officer, and Ms. Uma Kumari acted as Company Secretary.
Remote e-voting facilities were available from September 27, 2026, to September 29, 2026. The meeting concluded at 12:55 pm.
What the numbers show
The disclosure reveals a distinct separation between promoter influence and independent shareholder approval on sensitive governance issues. For Resolutions 1 and 2, the promoter group’s 21,98,400 votes were counted, contributing significantly to the total polled votes of 24,93,272. However, for Resolutions 3 and 4 concerning director remuneration, these same 21,98,400 votes were treated as invalid because the promoter was interested in the agenda.
Consequently, the outcome of the remuneration ratification relied entirely on the remaining 57 valid voters, who cast 2,94,872 votes. The high assent rate of 99.9998% in these cases indicates strong support from the non-interested public shareholders, despite the procedural lapse identified by auditors.
Historical Stock Returns for Tradewell Holdings
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.36% | 0.0% | -24.88% | +54.82% |
How might the SEBI or MCA react to the disclosed procedural lapse in obtaining prior shareholder approval for managerial remuneration?
Will the company implement stricter internal control mechanisms to prevent future administrative oversights regarding Section 197 compliance?
What impact could this governance controversy have on Tradewell Holdings' ability to attract institutional investors in future capital raises?


































