Starfighters Space backs Space Ready 2.0 Act for NASA infrastructure
Starfighters Space (NYSE: FJET) supports the Space Ready 2.0 Act (H.R. 9651 / S. 4905) to enable voluntary private investment in NASA infrastructure. The bill aims to modernize shared facilities at Kennedy Space Center without new federal spending, benefiting commercial operators like Starfighters Space that rely on robust spaceport infrastructure for Mach 2+ flight operations.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Starfighters Space, Inc. (NYSE: FJET) has announced its support for the Space Ready 2.0 Act, a legislative proposal designed to modernize shared infrastructure at NASA centers through voluntary private investment. Introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives as H.R. 9651 by Congressman Mike Haridopolos and in the U.S. Senate as S. 4905 by Senator Ashley Moody, the act seeks to address growing infrastructure demands from both government and commercial space operations. For Starfighters Space, which operates the world’s only commercial fleet of flight-ready Mach 2+ supersonic aircraft, the legislation represents a critical step toward ensuring reliable spaceport facilities on the Space Coast.
The proposed legislation would authorize NASA to establish a pilot program allowing the agency to collaborate with public and private entities to improve shared infrastructure at NASA centers, including Kennedy Space Center. This framework enables voluntary contributions toward eligible infrastructure projects without establishing a new federal spending program. By facilitating private-sector participation, the act aims to maintain modern and resilient roads, utilities, pipelines, and facilities essential for mission readiness.
Legislative Details
| Legislation | Chamber | Bill Number | Sponsor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Space Ready 2.0 Act | U.S. House of Representatives | H.R. 9651 | Congressman Mike Haridopolos (R-FL-8) |
| Space Ready 2.0 Act | U.S. Senate | S. 4905 | Senator Ashley Moody (R-FL) |
Kennedy Space Center has evolved into a multi-user spaceport supporting NASA missions, commercial launch providers, research organizations, and other government users. As activity on the spaceport continues to increase, the importance of modern infrastructure to operational reliability grows. Starfighters Space relies on this shared infrastructure to support its high-speed flight operations, space research, payload testing, and future air-launch development activities at Kennedy Space Center.
Strategic Importance
Tim Franta, CEO of Starfighters Space, emphasized that infrastructure built for an earlier era of spaceflight is now supporting a growing mix of operations. "The Space Ready 2.0 Act would provide a practical framework for NASA and its commercial partners to work together to modernize the shared infrastructure on which their missions depend, without creating a new federal spending program," Franta said. He added that maintaining modern and reliable spaceport infrastructure is essential to supporting continued growth on the Space Coast and preserving American leadership in space.
Starfighters Space joins other commercial space companies and Space Coast stakeholders in supporting the legislation. The company’s F-104 aircraft fleet, based at NASA Kennedy Space Center in Florida and the Midland Air and Space Port in Texas, is configurable for air-launched payloads, pilot training, and RDT&E (research, development, test, and evaluation) for hypersonic technologies and defense systems. The successful passage of the Space Ready 2.0 Act could directly impact the operational scalability and mission readiness of these advanced aerospace applications.
How might the voluntary private investment model of the Space Ready 2.0 Act influence the cost-sharing dynamics between NASA and commercial launch providers like Starfighters Space?
What specific infrastructure upgrades at Kennedy Space Center are most critical for supporting Mach 2+ supersonic operations and air-launched payload testing?
Could the passage of this legislation serve as a precedent for similar public-private infrastructure partnerships at other major U.S. spaceports?
































