Snowman Logistics receives ₹2.06 Cr tax penalty for AY 2024-25
- Snowman Logistics received a ₹2.06 crore tax demand for AY 2024-25
- Penalty imposed under Section 270A(13) for under-reported income
- Company plans to appeal, citing unsustainable penalty orders
- Management states no impact on financials or operations

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Snowman Logistics received an income tax demand of ₹2.06 crore for Assessment Year (AY) 2024-25. The notice, issued under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, pertains to a penalty levied under Section 270A(13) regarding under-reported income.
The company disclosed the receipt of the order on October 2, 2026, via a filing with the stock exchanges. The demand was issued by the Office of the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 2(1), Mumbai.
Company Response and Financial Impact
Snowman Logistics stated that it believes the penalty orders are not sustainable. The company is taking necessary steps to appeal against the orders before the appropriate authority and expressed hope for a favourable outcome at the appellate level.
Regarding the financial implications, the company asserted that there is no impact on its financials, operations, or other activities based on its current assessment.
Details of the Tax Demand
| Particulars | Details |
|---|---|
| Authority | Income Tax Department (Office of the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 2(1), Mumbai) |
| Date of Receipt | October 2, 2026 |
| Nature of Order | Notice of Demand under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 |
| Penalty Section | Section 270A(13) |
| Assessment Year | AY 2024-25 |
| Total Demand | ₹2,06,56,802 |
The disclosure was made pursuant to Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Historical Stock Returns for Snowman Logistics
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.53% | -3.04% | -9.43% | +11.11% | -34.58% | -20.58% |
How might the appeal process under Section 270A(13) impact Snowman Logistics' cash flow if a stay is not granted?
Could this penalty signal broader regulatory scrutiny on Snowman Logistics' transfer pricing or related-party transactions?
What historical success rate does the company have in overturning similar income tax demands at the appellate level?


































