Sangita sells 15.43% stake in Laser Diamonds in off-market deal
- Sangita sold 6,24,800 shares in Laser Diamonds Limited on September 12, 2026
- The off-market transaction reduced her stake from 38.57% to 23.14%
- The disposal was filed under SEBI SAST Regulation 29(2)
- Laser Diamonds' total equity capital remains at ₹4,05,00,000

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Sangita disposed of a 15.43% stake in Laser Diamonds Limited through an off-market transaction on September 12, 2026. The sale involved 6,24,800 equity shares, significantly reducing her voting power in the BSE-listed company.
The transaction was disclosed under Regulation 29(2) of the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011. Sangita is not classified as part of the promoter or promoter group of the target company.
Transaction Details
Prior to this disposal, Sangita held 15,62,000 shares, representing 38.57% of the total share and voting capital. None of these shares were encumbered by pledge, lien, or non-disposal undertakings.
| Metric | Before Sale | Shares Sold | After Sale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shares Held | 15,62,000 | 6,24,800 | 9,37,200 |
| Stake Percentage | 38.57% | 15.43% | 23.14% |
Following the sale, her remaining holding stands at 9,37,200 shares, equating to 23.14% of the total diluted share capital. The total equity share capital of Laser Diamonds Limited remains unchanged at ₹4,05,00,000, comprising 40,50,000 equity shares of ₹10 each.
What the Numbers Show
The off-market nature of the transaction suggests a negotiated block deal rather than open-market trading, often indicating a strategic exit or restructuring by a substantial shareholder. With the stake dropping below the 25% threshold commonly associated with significant control blocks, this move may alter the shareholder dynamics of the company.
How might the reduction of Sangita's stake below the 25% control threshold impact Laser Diamonds Limited's corporate governance and decision-making processes?
What are the potential implications for the stock's liquidity and price volatility given that this was an off-market block deal rather than an open-market sale?
Who is the likely buyer in this off-market transaction, and does their identity suggest a strategic partnership or a passive investment approach?

























