Sanghvi Movers reports governance lapses in FY26 audit
Sanghvi Movers Limited's Annual Secretarial Compliance Report for FY26 revealed several governance and procedural lapses, including delays in regulatory filings, incorrect signatories on key documents, and inadequate recording of board approvals. The company attributed these issues to inadvertence and transitional phases, confirming that remedial actions are underway to strengthen compliance with SEBI regulations.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Sanghvi Movers disclosed multiple compliance lapses for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, in its Annual Secretarial Compliance Report submitted to the stock exchanges. The report, issued by secretarial auditor M/s. Kanj & Co. LLP, identified deviations concerning regulatory filings, documentation of board approvals, and adherence to governance protocols. These lapses highlight gaps in the company's internal compliance mechanisms during the review period.
The audit revealed that the Annual Secretarial Compliance Report for the financial year 2024-25 was filed with a delay. Specifically, the report was submitted to the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (NSE) 1 hour and 11 minutes late, and to BSE Limited 1 hour and 6 minutes late. Additionally, the Quarterly Compliance Report on Corporate Governance for the quarters ended September 2025 and December 2025 was signed by the Managing Director rather than the mandated Compliance Officer or Chief Executive Officer.
Further procedural deviations were noted regarding the certification of financial results. The minutes of Board Meetings, except for the meeting held on May 20, 2025, did not specifically record the confirmation by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer that the financial results contained no false statements. The compliance certificate for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, was also issued by the CFO and Managing Director instead of the CEO as required under Regulation 17(8).
The report also pointed out deficiencies in the documentation of related party transactions and director evaluations. While transactions with subsidiaries were noted in the minutes, the records lacked specific references to 'approval' or 'prior approval' from the Audit Committee and the Board. Furthermore, the performance evaluation of Independent Directors was discussed but not specifically recorded in the minutes of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee and the Board Meeting.
In response to these findings, the company's management attributed several issues to inadvertence and transitional periods, such as the change in Company Secretary. The company stated that the evaluation of Independent Directors was conducted but recording was missed, and that subjective approvals for related party transactions were obtained. The auditor noted that the company is in the process of reviewing and updating its internal policies to align with the Companies Act, 2013 and SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Compliance Status Summary
| Sr. No. | Particulars | Compliance Status |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Secretarial Standards | No |
| 2. | Adoption and timely updation of the Policies | No |
| 3. | Maintenance and disclosures on Website | Yes |
| 4. | Disqualification of Director | Yes |
| 5. | Details related to Subsidiaries | Yes |
| 6. | Preservation of Documents | Yes |
| 7. | Performance Evaluation | No |
| 8. | Related Party Transactions | No |
| 9. | Disclosure of events or information | Yes |
| 10. | Prohibition of Insider Trading | Yes |
Historical Stock Returns for Sanghvi Movers
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.87% | +13.02% | +19.85% | +6.48% | +23.11% | +333.14% |
What potential regulatory penalties or sanctions could Sanghvi Movers face from SEBI or the stock exchanges for these governance lapses?
How will the ongoing internal policy review and the appointment of a new Company Secretary impact the company's operational efficiency in the near term?
Could these compliance deficiencies affect institutional investor confidence and lead to a revision in the stock's valuation by analysts?


































