Samhi Hotels receives INR 46.27 lakh stamp duty order from GNCTD
Samhi Hotels Limited received an order from the GNCTD Collector of Stamps on June 16, 2026, imposing a stamp duty liability of INR 16,27,532 and a penalty of INR 30,00,000, totaling INR 46,27,532. The order relates to the issuance of dematerialized shares in 2023 and disputes the applicability of stamp duty rates paid through depositories. The company maintains that it complied with the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and stated the order will not materially impact its financial or operational activities while it evaluates further action.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Samhi Hotels has received an order from the Office of the Divisional Commissioner, Revenue Department: Stamp and Registration Branch, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD), determining a total liability of INR 46,27,532. The order, dated June 16, 2026, adjudicates stamp duty related to the issuance of certain shares by the company in dematerialized form during 2023. The company stated that the order will not have a material impact on its financial, operational, or other activities.
The order was passed under Sections 33, 38, and 40 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. It establishes a stamp duty liability of INR 16,27,532 and imposes a penalty of INR 30,00,000. The Collector of Stamps, GNCTD, alleged that the stamp duty payable under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, read with provisions applicable to the National Capital Territory of Delhi, was due on the share allotment. The authority contended that payment made through depositories such as NSDL or CDSL at the applicable rate at the time of allotment does not discharge the company's statutory liability under the law applicable in the NCT of Delhi.
Samhi Hotels clarified that it had paid stamp duty in accordance with Section 9A(1) read with Article 56A of Schedule I of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. The payment was made through the depository mechanism prescribed by the Central Government at the rates prevailing at the relevant time. The company noted that the matter involves the interpretation of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, including Section 9A, and the applicability of stamp duty provisions in the NCT of Delhi regarding the issue or allotment of shares.
The dispute arises from a circular issued on July 29, 2025, by the Additional District Magistrate, Collector of Stamps, Revenue Department, Delhi. This circular disputed the rate of stamp duty applicable to the issuance of dematerialized shares under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, as amended by the Finance Act, 2019, and effective from July 1, 2020. Several companies have filed writ petitions before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi concerning this issue, and the proceedings are currently under judicial consideration.
The company disclosed that the maximum financial impact will be capped at the aggregated amount of the stamp duty liability and the penalty imposed by the order. Samhi Hotels is evaluating its next course of action regarding the order dated June 16, 2026.
Details of the Order
| Particulars | Details |
|---|---|
| Name of Authority | Office of the Divisional Commissioner, Revenue Department: Stamp and Registration Branch, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi |
| Date of Order | June 16, 2026 |
| Sections Invoked | Sections 33, 38, and 40 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 |
| Stamp Duty Liability | INR 16,27,532 |
| Penalty Imposed | INR 30,00,000 |
| Total Amount | INR 46,27,532 |
| Subject Matter | Issuance of certain shares in dematerialized form in the year 2023 |
Historical Stock Returns for Samhi Hotels
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.27% | +6.97% | +16.23% | -5.50% | -23.35% | +18.81% |
How will the Delhi High Court's ruling on the pending writ petitions influence the company's decision to appeal this order?
Could this interpretation of stamp duty laws by the Delhi authorities set a precedent for other companies facing similar demands?
What is the likelihood of Samhi Hotels recovering the penalty amount if the courts ultimately rule in favor of the depository payment mechanism?


































