Saint-Gobain Sekurit Q1FY26 profit falls 13% despite revenue growth
Saint-Gobain Sekurit India Limited saw its Q1FY26 net profit fall 12.9% to ₹93.4M while revenue grew 10.8% to ₹607.7M. EBITDA dropped to ₹99.1M with margins contracting to 16.3% from 21.2%, driven by higher material and other operational expenses.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Saint-Gobain Sekurit reported a year-on-year decline in profitability for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, despite achieving top-line growth. The company’s standalone net profit fell by 12.9% to ₹93.4 million, down from ₹107.1 million in the corresponding quarter of FY25. This contraction occurred even as total revenue from operations expanded by 10.8% to ₹607.7 million, driven by higher sales income and other operating income.
The Board of Directors approved the unaudited financial results on July 30, 2026. The results were reviewed by Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP, the statutory auditors, under Standard on Review Engagements (SRE) 2410. The financial statements were prepared in accordance with Indian Accounting Standard 34 (Ind AS 34) and Regulation 33 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Revenue and Cost Dynamics
Total revenue from operations stood at ₹607.7 million for Q1FY26, compared to ₹548.4 million in Q1FY25. Sales income contributed ₹592.1 million, up from ₹535.0 million previously, while other operating income rose to ₹15.7 million from ₹13.5 million. However, this growth was offset by rising expenses. Total expenses increased to ₹517.8 million from ₹441.0 million in the prior year period.
Key cost drivers included other expenses, which jumped to ₹131.2 million from ₹110.9 million, and power and fuel costs, which rose to ₹55.2 million from ₹47.1 million. Cost of materials consumed also increased significantly to ₹294.9 million from ₹238.6 million, reflecting input cost pressures or higher volume consumption.
Margin Contraction
The expansion in costs outpaced revenue growth, leading to a notable compression in operating margins. EBITDA declined to ₹99.1 million from ₹116.2 million in Q1FY25. Consequently, the EBITDA margin contracted sharply to 16.3% from 21.2% in the year-ago quarter. Profit before tax (PBT) fell to ₹121.2 million from ₹141.8 million, although tax benefits helped cushion the final bottom line impact slightly. Total tax expense was ₹27.8 million, lower than the ₹34.7 million recorded in Q1FY25, partly due to deferred tax credits.
| Metric | Q1FY26 (₹ M) | Q1FY25 (₹ M) | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations | 607.7 | 548.4 | +10.8 |
| EBITDA | 99.1 | 116.2 | -14.7 |
| EBITDA Margin | 16.3% | 21.2% | -4.9 pts |
| Net Profit | 93.4 | 107.1 | -12.9 |
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between revenue growth and profit decline highlights significant margin pressure. While sales volume or pricing may have improved (indicated by the 10.8% revenue rise), the company faced disproportionate increases in operational costs. The 26.4% surge in 'other expenses' and 23.6% rise in material costs suggest that input inflation or operational inefficiencies eroded the benefits of higher top-line performance. Investors should monitor whether these cost pressures are transient or structural, as they directly impact the sustainability of earnings growth.
Earnings per share (EPS) decreased to ₹1.03 from ₹1.18 in Q1FY25. The company had no subsidiaries, associates, or joint ventures during the period. The Board meeting commenced at 12:00 p.m. IST and concluded at 1:05 p.m. IST on July 30, 2026.
Historical Stock Returns for Saint Gobain Sekurit
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -4.94% | -4.06% | -5.80% | +23.97% | +15.77% | +93.43% |
What specific strategies is Saint-Gobain Sekurit implementing to mitigate the 23.6% surge in material costs and stabilize EBITDA margins in Q2FY26?
How sustainable is the current 10.8% revenue growth trajectory given the disproportionate rise in 'other expenses' and power/fuel costs?
Will management consider price hikes for automotive glass products to offset input inflation, or does competitive pressure limit this option?


































