RattanIndia Enterprises Q1 Results: Net Profit Rises to ₹147.35M, EBITDA at ₹400M
RattanIndia Enterprises reported a Q1FY26 consolidated net profit of ₹147.35 million, reversing a ₹1,101 million loss in the prior quarter, with revenue rising 10.2% QoQ to ₹18,704.76 million. EBITDA came in at ₹400 million with a margin of 2.14%, sharply lower than 26.32% in Q1FY25, as the prior year period included a one-time unrealized fair value gain of ₹6,096.49 million on RPL shares. The e-commerce segment remained the primary revenue driver, while the reclassification of RPL as an associate under Ind AS 28 has stabilized earnings volatility going forward.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
RattanIndia Enterprises reported a consolidated net profit of ₹147.35 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, reversing the ₹1,101.00 million loss recorded in the previous quarter. The turnaround was driven by a surge in retail e-commerce revenue and a positive contribution from its associate, RattanIndia Power Limited (RPL), following an accounting classification change. Total consolidated revenue from operations rose 10.2% quarter-on-quarter to ₹18,704.76 million, while EBITDA stood at ₹400 million, compared to ₹6.09 billion in the same quarter last year.
The Board of Directors approved the unaudited financial results on August 05, 2026. The statutory auditors, Walker Chandiook & Co. LLP, issued a limited review report on the standalone and consolidated results. The company continues to operate as an Unregistered Core Investment Company (CIC) under the Reserve Bank of India's Master Directions, investing in technology-focused businesses including e-commerce, electric vehicles, and drones.
Consolidated Financial Performance
Consolidated revenue from operations stood at ₹18,704.76 million for Q1FY26, compared to ₹16,966.27 million in Q4FY25 and ₹23,131.75 million in the same quarter last year. The decline year-on-year is largely attributable to the absence of unrealized fair value gains on RPL shares that were recognized in Q1FY25 before RPL was reclassified as an associate. The EBITDA margin contracted sharply to 2.14% from 26.32% in the year-ago period, reflecting the non-recurrence of those one-time fair value gains.
| Particulars | Q1FY26 | Q1FY25 | Change (YoY) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations | ₹18,704.76M | ₹23,131.75M | -19.13% |
| EBITDA | ₹400M | ₹6,090M | -93.43% |
| EBITDA Margin | 2.14% | 26.32% | -2418 bps |
| Profit Before Tax | ₹280.99M | ₹5,919.19M | -95.25% |
| Net Profit After Tax | ₹147.35M | ₹5,023.20M | -97.07% |
| Basic EPS (₹) | 0.11 | 3.64 | -96.98% |
The following table provides a sequential comparison of key financial metrics:
| Particulars | Q1FY26 (₹ Million) | Q4FY25 (₹ Million) | Q1FY25 (₹ Million) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations | 18,704.76 | 16,966.27 | 23,131.75 |
| Total Expenses | 18,523.59 | 18,217.33 | 17,248.07 |
| Profit Before Tax | 280.99 | (1,226.30) | 5,919.19 |
| Net Profit After Tax | 147.35 | (1,101.00) | 5,023.20 |
| Basic EPS (₹) | 0.11 | (0.80) | 3.64 |
The retail e-commerce segment contributed ₹18,401.92 million to segment income, up from ₹16,499.86 million in the prior quarter. The EV (E-Motorcycles) segment reported income of ₹269.14 million. The investment segment, which previously accounted for significant fair value gains/losses, now contributes only through the equity method, with a share of profit from RPL amounting to ₹91.71 million.
Standalone Results and Segment Details
On a standalone basis, the holding company reported a net loss of ₹86.25 million for the quarter, compared to a loss of ₹1,247.57 million in the preceding quarter. Standalone revenue from operations was ₹57.47 million, primarily comprising interest income and fees. The improvement in standalone profitability is partly due to lower finance costs and the cessation of recognizing fair value losses on RPL shares through the profit and loss account.
Effective March 25, 2026, RPL was classified as an associate under Ind AS 28 after the group obtained significant influence. Consequently, subsequent changes in RPL's market value are no longer recognized through profit or loss. In Q1FY25, the group had recognized an unrealized fair value gain of ₹6,096.49 million on RPL, which inflated profits during that period. This non-recurring item explains the sharp year-on-year decline in consolidated PAT and EBITDA despite operational improvements.
Legal and Regulatory Updates
The company disclosed ongoing legal matters involving its step-down subsidiary, Throttle Aerospace Systems Private Limited (TAS). Minority shareholders of TAS have filed petitions before the NCLT Bangalore, though a stay order on shareholding patterns has been vacated. An arbitrator has been appointed to adjudicate the dispute under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996. Management believes these matters will not materially impact financial results.
Additionally, Canara Bank has appealed an NCLT order that dismissed its insolvency application against the holding company as a corporate guarantor for Sinnar Thermal Power Limited. The appeal is pending before NCLAT. Management maintains that the bank's case is not maintainable and expects no material impact on operations.
What the Numbers Show
The shift from fair-value accounting to the equity method for RPL has normalized the volatility in RattanIndia's bottom line. While this reduced headline profits and EBITDA compared to the windfall gains seen in Q1FY25, it provides a clearer view of operational performance. The e-commerce segment remains the primary revenue driver, growing sequentially, while the EV segment continues to face margin pressures, reporting a segment result of (₹86.56) million. The group's total assets increased to ₹30,540.69 million, reflecting continued investment in its core business units.
Historical Stock Returns for Rattan India Enterprises
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.40% | +0.13% | -5.08% | -2.03% | -43.62% | -36.89% |
How will the normalization of RPL accounting from fair value to equity method impact investor sentiment and valuation multiples in the near term?
What specific strategies is RattanIndia Enterprises implementing to improve margins in the EV segment, which reported a loss of ₹86.56 million?
Could the ongoing NCLAT appeal by Canara Bank regarding Sinnar Thermal Power Limited pose a material liquidity risk or affect the company's credit ratings?


































