Rashi Peripherals defends governance after Anil Khandelwal resignation
- Rashi Peripherals accepted Anil Khandelwal's resignation as Independent Director effective August 25, 2026
- Company filed clarification under Regulation 30 read with Para A(7B) of Part A of Schedule III of SEBI LODR Regulations
- Board defended governance citing unanimous resolutions and arm's length related-party transactions
- Related-party disclosures made in Form MBP-1 under Section 184(1) of Companies Act 2013

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Rashi Peripherals accepted the resignation of Anil Khandelwal as Independent Director effective August 25, 2026. The company issued a comprehensive clarification on the same date, addressing Khandelwal’s cited concerns regarding governance lapses and transparency.
The disclosure was filed with BSE and NSE pursuant to Regulation 30 read with Para A(7B) of Part A of Schedule III of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. Khandelwal had stepped down from his roles in the Nomination and Remuneration Committee (NRC), CSR Committee, and as Chairman of the Stakeholders' Relationship Committee.
Governance Response
Rashi Peripherals Limited stated that all resolutions on director selection and key managerial personnel remuneration are unanimous. The company described Khandelwal’s observations regarding internal deliberative processes as subjective assessments rather than breaches of law or regulation.
The company noted that the NRC is duly constituted under Section 178 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Regulation 19, comprising five members including four Independent Directors and one Chairman/Whole-Time Director. The committee is chaired by an Independent Director. The Board affirmed that all suggestions from the outgoing director were considered and implemented where desirable.
Related-Party Transactions
The company addressed concerns about professional assignments awarded to firms associated with Independent Directors. Rashi Peripherals disclosed that it recently acquired a majority stake in another company. The acquisition involved a law firm for drafting the Share Purchase Agreement, where one senior partner serves as an Independent Director on the board.
Financial and tax due diligence for the target company was conducted by a professional firm whose senior partner is the Audit Committee Chairman and an Independent Director. The company asserted that each concerned director disclosed their interest in Form MBP-1 under Section 184(1) read with Rule 9 of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014. These disclosures were noted at the first Board meeting of each financial year and upon any changes.
The fact that these professional services were taken was evident in presentations sent to directors, ensuring all board members were aware of the relationships.
Arm's Length Assertions
Rashi Peripherals maintained that services from these firms were availed at arm's length, with fees within statutorily prescribed limits under the Companies Act, 2013. Declarations under Section 149(7) and Regulation 25(8) were obtained to ensure independence.
The Board approved the acquisition on June 23, 2026, based on two valuation reports from Independent External Valuation Experts. The resolution passed unanimously.
Krishna Kumar Choudhary, Whole-time Director and Chairman, signed the disclosure, affirming the company's commitment to corporate governance standards, transparency, and regulatory compliance. The Board stated it remains open to constructive dialogue to address concerns professionally.
Historical Stock Returns for Rashi Peripherals
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.53% | +9.07% | +11.67% | +141.41% | +172.55% | +170.73% |
Will Rashi Peripherals initiate an immediate search for a new Independent Director to replace Anil Khandelwal, and what criteria will be prioritized to restore board confidence?
How might the public dispute over governance lapses impact investor sentiment and the company's stock valuation in the short term?
Are there any pending regulatory inquiries from SEBI regarding the related-party transactions with firms linked to independent directors?






























