Procal Electronics corrects audit impact statement for FY26
Procal Electronics India Ltd corrected a clerical error in its filing to the BSE by submitting the revised Statement on Impact of Audit Qualifications for FY26 using audited annual figures. The auditors issued an adverse opinion due to the erosion of net worth, lack of operations, and inability to verify asset sales and accounting adjustments. Key financial metrics show a net loss of -4.12 and a negative net worth of -552.75.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Procal Electronics India Ltd has submitted a revised Statement on Impact of Audit Qualifications for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, to the Bombay Stock Exchange. The correction addresses a discrepancy observed by the exchange, where the company inadvertently reported figures based on quarterly financial results instead of the audited yearly financial results. The revised filing confirms that the statutory auditors issued an audit report with an adverse opinion, highlighting significant material uncertainties regarding the company's ability to continue as a going concern.
The company's net worth has been fully eroded due to continuous losses, and there are no current business operations. The manufacturing unit at Silvassa, along with movable and immovable assets, was under the possession of Canara Bank due to credit facilities classified as Non-Performing Assets (NPA). These assets were sold through E-auction for an aggregate consideration of approximately Rs. 49.07 lakh, adjusted against outstanding dues. However, the auditors noted that complete supporting documents relating to the sale proceedings, appropriation of proceeds, and valuation basis were not made available for verification, preventing independent confirmation of the accounting treatment.
The table below presents the audited financial figures as reported before and after adjusting for the audit qualifications. There is no financial impact quantified by the adjustments in the revised statement.
| Particulars | Audited Figures (Before Adjustments) | Adjusted Figures (After Adjustments) |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover / Total income | 0 | 0 |
| Total Expenditure | 118.60 | 118.60 |
| Net Profit/(Loss) | -4.12 | -4.12 |
| Earnings Per Share | -0.12 | -0.12 |
| Total Assets | 688.22 | 688.22 |
| Total Liabilities | 1240.98 | 1240.98 |
| Net Worth | -552.75 | -552.75 |
Audit Qualifications
The adverse opinion stems from several key areas. The company allocated 76% of the total sale consideration towards inventories and 24% towards fixed assets, as no separate valuation was provided by Canara Bank. Consequently, the inventory balance was reduced to Nil. The auditors were unable to verify the existence, valuation, and accounting treatment of these inventories and fixed assets due to the lack of independent evidence and valuation reports.
Additionally, the company wrote off or wrote back various debit and credit balances based on management assessment and Board approval dated March 31, 2026. The auditors stated that adequate supporting documents and external confirmations were not provided to verify the appropriateness of these adjustments. Furthermore, the company did not obtain balance confirmations from trade receivables, trade payables, or lenders, making it impossible to verify the correctness and recoverability of these balances.
Banking and Operational Status
The company's bank accounts were inoperative during the year due to pending KYC compliance formalities. Certain expenses were incurred by directors through their personal accounts. The auditors expressed an inability to independently verify the completeness and authenticity of these transactions routed through personal accounts. The filing was signed by Mahendra Kumar Bothra, Managing Director, and PAMS & Associates, Statutory Auditor.
What specific steps will the management take to address the statutory auditors' adverse opinion regarding the company's ability to continue as a going concern?
Does the company have any strategic plans to restart business operations or acquire new assets following the liquidation of the Silvassa manufacturing unit?
How will the company resolve the lack of independent documentation regarding the asset sale to satisfy future regulatory or audit requirements?



























