PG Electroplast Shareholders Approve Re-appointment of Two Independent Directors via Postal Ballot
PG Electroplast Limited concluded its postal ballot e-voting process with shareholders approving both special resolutions for re-appointment of independent directors. Mr. Ram Dayal Modi's re-appointment received 99.61% votes in favour, while Mrs. Ruchika Bansal's re-appointment passed with 92.68% support, with institutional investors recording a higher dissent of 18.84% against her resolution. The scrutinizer confirmed both resolutions secured requisite majority, with results declared on May 04, 2026.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
PG Electroplast Limited has successfully concluded its postal ballot e-voting process, with shareholders approving both resolutions pertaining to the re-appointment of independent directors. The results were declared on Monday, May 04, 2026, following the closure of the e-voting window at 5:00 P.M. on Thursday, April 30, 2026. The voting was conducted in compliance with Regulation 30 and Regulation 44 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Postal Ballot Process Overview
The postal ballot process was initiated pursuant to a notice dated March 24, 2026. E-voting commenced on Wednesday, April 01, 2026 at 9:00 hours IST and concluded on Thursday, April 30, 2026 at 17:00 hours IST. The record date (cut-off date) was fixed as Friday, March 27, 2026, as on which date the total number of shareholders stood at 2,27,508. The remote e-voting platform was facilitated by Kfin Technologies Limited, and the scrutinizer for the process was Puja Mishra, Company Secretary in Practice, Proprietor of M/s Puja Mishra & Co.
The key details of the postal ballot process are summarised below:
| Parameter: | Details |
|---|---|
| Postal Ballot Notice Date: | March 24, 2026 |
| Dispatch of Notice: | March 31, 2026 |
| E-Voting Start: | Wednesday, April 01, 2026 (9:00 hours IST) |
| E-Voting End: | Thursday, April 30, 2026 (17:00 hours IST) |
| Record Date: | Friday, March 27, 2026 |
| Total Shareholders on Record Date: | 2,27,508 |
| Result Declaration Date: | Monday, May 04, 2026 |
| E-Voting Platform Provider: | Kfin Technologies Limited |
Resolution 1: Re-appointment of Mr. Ram Dayal Modi as Independent Director
The first special resolution sought approval for the re-appointment of Mr. Ram Dayal Modi (DIN: 03047117) as an Independent Director of the company, along with continuation of his directorship after attaining the age of 75 years. The resolution received overwhelming shareholder support. The detailed voting results across shareholder categories are presented below:
| Category: | Shares Held | Votes Polled | % Votes Polled | Votes in Favour | Votes Against | % in Favour | % Against |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter & Promoter Group (E-Voting): | 117146240 | 117141240 | 99.9957 | 117141240 | 0 | 100.0000 | 0.0000 |
| Public – Institutions (E-Voting): | 97632305 | 79935226 | 81.8737 | 79132485 | 802741 | 98.9957 | 1.0042 |
| Public – Non Institutions (E-Voting): | 70564113 | 8628869 | 12.2284 | 8625344 | 3525 | 99.9591 | 0.0408 |
| Total: | 285342658 | 205705335 | 72.0906 | 204899069 | 806266 | 99.6080 | 0.3920 |
Of the total valid votes cast, 537 members voted in favour with 204899069 votes (99.61%), while 90 members voted against with 806266 votes (0.39%). Additionally, 6 members abstained from voting, accounting for 8357 abstained votes. No votes were declared invalid.
Resolution 2: Re-appointment of Mrs. Ruchika Bansal as Independent Director
The second special resolution sought approval for the re-appointment of Mrs. Ruchika Bansal (DIN: 06505221) as an Independent Director of the company. While the resolution passed with requisite majority, it recorded a comparatively higher proportion of votes against, particularly from institutional investors. The detailed voting results are as follows:
| Category: | Shares Held | Votes Polled | % Votes Polled | Votes in Favour | Votes Against | % in Favour | % Against |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter & Promoter Group (E-Voting): | 117146240 | 117141240 | 99.9957 | 117141240 | 0 | 100.0000 | 0.0000 |
| Public – Institutions (E-Voting): | 97632305 | 79935226 | 81.8737 | 64874201 | 15061025 | 81.1584 | 18.8415 |
| Public – Non Institutions (E-Voting): | 70564113 | 8627741 | 12.2268 | 8624421 | 3320 | 99.9615 | 0.0384 |
| Total: | 285342658 | 205704207 | 72.0902 | 190639862 | 15064345 | 92.6767 | 7.3233 |
Of the total valid votes cast, 488 members voted in favour with 190639862 votes (92.68%), while 137 members voted against with 15064345 votes (7.32%). A total of 8 members abstained from voting, representing 8695 abstained votes. No votes were declared invalid.
Scrutinizer's Findings and Outcome
The scrutinizer, Puja Mishra of M/s Puja Mishra & Co., confirmed that both resolutions secured the requisite votes for special resolutions and that the voting process was conducted in a fair and transparent manner. All electronic data and relevant records of e-voting have been handed over to the Company Secretary for safe keeping. The results, along with the Scrutinizer's Report dated May 04, 2026, have been submitted to BSE Limited and National Stock Exchange of India Limited, and are also available on the company's website at www.pgel.in . The filing was signed by Deepesh Kedia, Company Secretary of PG Electroplast Limited.
Historical Stock Returns for PG Electroplast
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2.28% | -3.29% | +19.82% | -4.26% | -33.74% | +1,509.99% |
Will the ~18.8% institutional opposition to Mrs. Ruchika Bansal's re-appointment signal growing scrutiny of her board performance or independence credentials in future governance assessments?
How might the significant institutional pushback on Resolution 2 influence PG Electroplast's approach to board composition and independent director selection in upcoming appointments?
Could the contrasting voting outcomes between the two resolutions prompt proxy advisory firms to revise their governance ratings for PG Electroplast, potentially affecting institutional investor sentiment?


































