Perma-Fix Q2 EPS misses estimates as revenue falls 11.6%
Perma-Fix Environmental Services reported Q2 2026 results with a net loss of $6.2 million and EPS of $(0.32), missing analyst estimates. Revenue fell 11.6% to $12.9 million, driven by lower volumes in the Treatment segment, though the Services segment grew 44%. The company maintains $20.5 million in cash but faces going-concern doubts.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: PESI) reported a net loss of $6.2 million for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026, widening significantly from the $2.7 million loss recorded in the same period of 2025. The company’s earnings per share (EPS) came in at $(0.32), missing the analyst consensus estimate of $(0.31) by 3.23%. Total revenue declined to $12.9 million (reported as $12.885 million in detailed filings) from $14.6 million year-over-year, missing the $12.9 million ($12.900 million) consensus estimate by 0.12%.
Despite the top-line contraction, management highlighted operational milestones, including the commencement of liquid effluent waste receipts from the Direct-Feed Low-Activity Waste (DFLAW) facility at its Perma-Fix Northwest (PFNW) site. Additionally, the company was awarded a Master Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Subcontract by Hanford Tank Waste Operations & Closure, LLC, for grouting and disposal of mixed low-level waste, with task orders eligible for issuance beginning January 2027.
Financial Performance
The financial results were characterized by a divergence between the two business segments. The Services segment saw revenue surge 44% to $4.6 million from $3.2 million, supported by higher project volumes and a services backlog exceeding $17 million. Conversely, the Treatment segment revenue dropped to $8.3 million from $11.4 million.
The decline in Treatment revenue was attributed to lower waste volumes and a less favorable revenue mix, specifically the processing of previously stored, lower-margin waste inventories. Customer-directed changes in treatment protocols also delayed the processing of certain Hanford-related waste streams, shifting associated revenue to the second half of 2026 while operating costs were incurred in the current quarter.
| Metric | Q2 2026 | Q2 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $12.9 million | $14.6 million | -11.6% |
| Gross Profit (Loss) | $(2.5) million | $1.5 million | Turned negative |
| Operating Loss | $(6.5) million | $(2.9) million | Widened |
| Net Loss | $(6.2) million | $(2.7) million | Widened |
| EBITDA | $(5.9) million | $(2.3) million | Widened |
What the Numbers Show
The Treatment segment’s gross margin collapsed to (32.0%) from 13.7% in the prior year, resulting in a $2.6 million gross loss compared to a $1.6 million profit previously. This deterioration was driven by fixed operating costs being spread over a lower revenue base. While the Services segment improved its gross margin to 3.2% from (0.6%), its absolute contribution of $149,000 was insufficient to offset the Treatment segment’s drag. The overall gross loss of $2.5 million indicates that cost structures remain rigid despite the temporary dip in high-margin throughput.
Balance Sheet and Liquidity
Cash and cash equivalents stood at $20.5 million as of June 30, 2026, up from $11.8 million at the end of FY25, bolstered by a May 2026 public equity offering. However, the company continues to disclose substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern due to recurring operating losses and negative operating cash flows. Management noted that liquidity is supported by existing cash, anticipated operating cash flows, and borrowing availability, with the maturity of its PNC credit facility extended from May 2027 to May 2030.
Outlook and Strategic Developments
Management expressed encouragement regarding the second half of 2026, citing the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Hanford Dual Glass-Plus-Grout Strategy. This strategy is expected to provide up to 300% more throughput by supplementing vitrification with commercial grouting capacity. Perma-Fix Northwest is currently working with Washington State regulators to expand its grouting permit from an annual capacity of 1.2 million gallons to levels meeting DOE objectives for both East and West tank areas, with upgrades targeted for completion by the third quarter of 2027.
How will the delayed revenue from Hanford-related waste streams impact Perma-Fix's cash burn rate and liquidity position in Q3 and Q4 2026?
What are the specific regulatory hurdles or timelines for expanding the PFNW grouting permit to meet the DOE's Dual Glass-Plus-Grout Strategy objectives by late 2027?
Given the 'substantial doubt' regarding going concern status, what specific financial thresholds must be met in the next two quarters to alleviate investor concerns about potential dilution or debt restructuring?

























