Patanjali Foods hit with ₹80.37 lakh GST penalty over ITC claims
Patanjali Foods Ltd was penalized ₹80,37,898 by Rajasthan’s State Tax Department for alleged misuse of Input Tax Credit. The order, received on July 28, 2026, requires reversal of excess ITC. The company denies broader financial impact and plans to appeal.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Patanjali Foods Limited has been ordered to pay a penalty of ₹80,37,898 by the Office of the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax Department, Circle-H, Jaipur-1, Rajasthan. The order, dated July 28, 2026, cites the company’s alleged wrongful availment of excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) and non-reversal of ineligible ITC under Goods and Services Tax (GST) laws. Patanjali Foods disclosed the regulatory communication to stock exchanges on July 29, 2026, stating that the penalty will not impact its broader financial or operational activities.
The disclosure was made pursuant to Regulation 30 read with sub-para 20 of Para A of Part A of Schedule III of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The filing also references SEBI Circular No. SEBI/HO/CFD/CFD-PoD-2/P/CIR/2025/25 dated February 25, 2025, and SEBI Master Circular HO/49/14/14(7)2025-CFD-POD2/I/3762/2026 dated January 30, 2026.
Key Details of the Order
| Particulars | Details |
|---|---|
| Authority | Office of the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax Department, Circle-H, Jaipur-1 |
| Order Number | DRC-07/2026-27/Circle-H/01 |
| Date of Order | July 28, 2026 |
| Penalty Amount | ₹80,37,898 |
| Alleged Violation | Wrongly availed excess ITC; Non-Reversal of ineligible ITC |
The tax authority issued the Order-in-Original in Form DRC-07, directing the reversal of ITC deemed wrongly availed. The specific contravention identified involves the failure to reverse ITC that was ineligible under GST regulations.
Company Response
Patanjali Foods stated that it does not expect any financial liability beyond the specified penalty amount of ₹80,37,898. The company emphasized that the order will not have any impact on its financial, operational, or other activities. Management confirmed that necessary actions will be taken to defend the case before the appellate authority.
What This Means
While the monetary value of the penalty is relatively contained, the finding highlights compliance scrutiny on input tax credit mechanisms, which are critical for cash flow management in manufacturing and food processing sectors. The company’s intent to appeal suggests it disputes the authority’s assessment of the ITC eligibility. Investors should monitor subsequent filings for updates on the appeal process and any potential additional liabilities or interest charges that may arise during litigation.
Historical Stock Returns for Patanjali Foods
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +4.14% | +4.97% | -13.44% | -29.38% | -42.44% | -1.56% |
How might this ITC dispute signal broader GST compliance risks for other major players in the Indian food processing sector?
What is the historical success rate of Patanjali Foods in overturning similar tax authority orders during appellate proceedings?
Could the potential accrual of interest and additional penalties during the appeal process significantly alter the company's net profit margins for the upcoming fiscal year?


































