Paras Petrofils passes resolutions at 35th AGM with high promoter support
- Paras Petrofils passed both resolutions at its 35th AGM held on September 29, 2026
- Promoter group voted in favour of all resolutions, securing passage with over 99.99% support
- Only two public shareholders participated via Video Conferencing out of 92,245 record holders
- Zero votes were polled by Public Institutions during the e-voting process

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Paras Petrofils Limited announced the voting results of its 35th Annual General Meeting (AGM) held on September 29, 2026, via Video Conferencing. The company disclosed that all proposed resolutions were duly passed with the requisite majority in compliance with SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015.
The meeting, conducted through Video Conferencing/Other Audio-Visual Means, addressed two primary agenda items: the adoption of audited standalone financial statements for FY26 and the reappointment of a director retiring by rotation. The scrutinizer’s report confirmed that remote e-voting and electronic voting at the meeting were conducted fairly and transparently.
Voting outcomes on key resolutions
The first resolution sought to receive, consider, and adopt the Audited Standalone Financial Statements for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, including the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Statement, and reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors. This resolution received overwhelming support from the promoter group, while public shareholders largely abstained or voted in favor.
The second resolution concerned the reappointment of Sanjay Jayant Bhatt as a director, replacing himself upon retirement by rotation under Section 152(6) of the Companies Act, 2013. Similar to the first resolution, the promoter group voted unanimously in favor, ensuring its passage despite minimal public participation.
| Resolution | Total Votes Polled | Votes in Favour | Votes Against | % In Favour |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adoption of Financial Statements | 79,831,477 | 79,830,477 | 1,000 | 99.998747% |
| Reappointment of Director | 79,831,477 | 79,829,472 | 2,005 | 99.997488% |
Shareholder participation trends
Data from the filing highlights a significant disparity in participation between promoter and public shareholders. Out of 92,245 shareholders on record as of September 18, 2026, only 60 individuals attended via Video Conferencing. Of these, 58 were from the Promoter and Promoter Group, while only two were public shareholders.
In terms of voting power, the Promoter and Promoter Group held 134,461,990 shares but cast votes representing 79,787,400 shares. Public non-institutional shareholders, holding 199,759,010 shares, cast votes for only 44,077 shares. This indicates that public shareholder engagement remained extremely low relative to their shareholding base.
What the Numbers Show
The voting data reveals a near-total absence of institutional investor presence, with zero votes polled by Public Institutions across both resolutions. Furthermore, the divergence in dissent is notable: while only one member voted against the adoption of financial statements (1,000 votes), two members voted against the director’s reappointment (2,005 votes). Despite this slight increase in dissent for the directorial appointment, the total votes against remained negligible at less than 0.01% of the total votes polled, underscoring the dominance of promoter control in corporate governance decisions.
Historical Stock Returns for Paras Petrofils
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.42% | -2.88% | -9.01% | -19.52% | -11.01% | +34.67% |
How might the near-zero institutional investor participation impact Paras Petrofils' future eligibility for inclusion in major ESG or governance-focused indices?
Will the continued low public shareholder engagement trigger increased regulatory scrutiny from SEBI regarding corporate governance standards for small-cap entities?
What strategic initiatives is management planning to implement to improve liquidity and attract broader retail and institutional interest given the current promoter dominance?


































