Goldman Sachs courts investors for Nvidia’s $500 billion AI financing push
Goldman Sachs is actively courting investors for Nvidia's $500 billion AI financing initiative, offering junior capital and private credit solutions. This follows a partnership announcement with five other major asset managers. The move leverages Goldman's prior advisory role in Nvidia's Mellanox acquisition and recent bond sale. However, the structure faces criticism from Michael Burry and Ben Emons, who cite risks from GPU depreciation and Chinese competition.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) is reportedly in talks with potential investors to participate in Nvidia Corp.’s (NASDAQ: NVDA) initiative to unlock more than $500 billion in third-party capital for AI infrastructure. According to Reuters, the bank aims to supply junior capital and private credit while helping place debt into both private and public markets. Asset managers involved in the partnership plan to retain a sizable share of the financing.
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang unveiled the plan on Monday alongside Apollo Global Management Inc., BlackRock Inc., Blackstone Inc., Brookfield Asset Management Inc., Goldman Sachs, and KKR & Co. Inc. In a CNBC interview, Goldman CEO David Solomon stated that Huang approached the bank with the idea for the financing structure, which Goldman welcomed. Solomon noted that the bank has advised Nvidia on its $6.9 billion acquisition of Mellanox Technologies and served as a joint book-running manager on Nvidia’s June $25 billion bond sale.
Strategic Partners and Capital Pools
The collaboration integrates Nvidia’s accelerated computing platform with the long-term capital capabilities of leading alternative asset managers and investment banks. Each partner has committed to creating dedicated financing structures to support the deployment of Nvidia compute assets. The effort aims to help hyperscalers, AI labs, and enterprises fund data centers through institutional credit and private investment.
| Partner Firm | Key Executive | Role/Title |
|---|---|---|
| Apollo Global Management Inc. | Jim Zelter | President |
| BlackRock Inc. | Larry Fink | Chairman and CEO |
| Blackstone Inc. | Jon Gray | President and COO |
| Brookfield Asset Management Inc. | Bruce Flatt | CEO |
| Goldman Sachs Group Inc. | David Solomon | Chairman and CEO |
| KKR & Co. Inc. | Joe Bae and Scott Nuttall | Co-Chief Executive Officers |
Jim Zelter, President of Apollo, noted that modern compute has emerged as a scarce, mission-critical asset class. Larry Fink, Chairman and CEO of BlackRock, added that the partnership deepens their existing relationship and connects long-term capital to essential infrastructure.
Market Sentiment and Skepticism
Despite the institutional backing, the financing model faces scrutiny. Famed investor Michael Burry sharply criticized the initiative, labeling it a "Wall Street stunt" that relies on opaque private credit arrangements. Burry warned that the deal involves Nvidia taking 25% stakes and providing residual value guarantees on chip purchases, arguing that the structure may not offer genuine diversification or risk mitigation.
The financing model treats Nvidia’s AI infrastructure as an "investable asset." However, unlike traditional infrastructure, cutting-edge GPUs depreciate quickly as newer chips arrive. Ben Emons, founder of FedWatch Advisors, estimates that investors may demand high-yield returns of roughly 11% to 17% to compensate for this depreciation risk, particularly if Chinese chipmakers offer cheaper alternatives. Emons also flagged China’s cheaper chips as a risk to GPU collateral values underpinning the debt.
Jensen Huang argues that Nvidia’s CUDA software ecosystem can keep older GPUs productive for longer, mitigating some depreciation concerns. Additionally, U.S. restrictions have limited access to leading Chinese AI chips, including Huawei Technologies’ Ascend processors, providing a temporary competitive moat.
Stock Performance
According to Benzinga Pro data, Goldman Sachs closed at 1,042.63, up 0.52%, on Thursday, while Nvidia closed at 225.30, up 0.54%. Nvidia’s market cap stands at $5.45 trillion with a year-to-date gain of 19.30%. Goldman Sachs has a market cap of $303.58 billion with a year-to-date gain of 14.03%.
Bank of America analyst Vivek Arya maintained Nvidia as a "top pick" with a $350 price target. BofA forecasts quarterly revenue of $94 billion to $95 billion, roughly $3 billion to $4 billion above the company’s $91 billion guidance.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between bullish analyst estimates and cautious market sentiment highlights the complexity of Nvidia’s new financing model. While Polymarket assigns only a 9% chance that Nvidia shares will close above $250 by Aug. 31, Bank of America projects significant revenue growth. The key risk lies in the durability of GPU values as collateral; if Chinese competitors successfully scale cheaper alternatives, the high-yield returns demanded by investors could pressure the profitability of these financing structures. This dynamic underscores the tension between rapid technological obsolescence and the long-duration nature of institutional capital.
Regulatory and Forward-Looking Disclosures
These partnerships remain subject to the execution of final agreements. The press release includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for Nvidia, Apollo, BlackRock, Blackstone, Brookfield, Goldman Sachs, and KKR. These statements involve risks and uncertainties, including global economic conditions, technological development, competition, and regulatory changes. Investors are cautioned that actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
How might the rapid depreciation of GPU hardware impact the long-term viability of private credit structures that rely on these assets as collateral?
What specific regulatory hurdles could arise if U.S. export controls on AI chips tighten further, potentially affecting the global deployment of Nvidia-funded infrastructure?
Could the entry of cheaper Chinese AI chip alternatives significantly erode the residual value guarantees provided by Nvidia in this financing model?

































