Neptune Insurance Q2FY26 Results: Revenue up 33%, EBITDA margin hits 62%
- Revenue rose 33% YoY to $55.9 million; adjusted EBITDA up 36% to $34.5 million
- Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 165 bps to 62%; full-year guidance raised to $199 million
- Lifetime written loss ratio fell to record low of 19.5%; premium in force up 32%
- AI tool Atlas engaged 3,700 agents; revenue per employee hit record $3 million

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Neptune Insurance Holdings (NYSE: NP) reported record second-quarter FY26 results, with revenue rising 33% year-over-year to $55.9 million. Adjusted EBITDA reached $34.5 million, marking a 62% margin that expanded 165 basis points from the prior year.
The insurer raised its full-year revenue guidance to $199 million, implying 25% growth, while projecting an adjusted EBITDA margin of 60-61%. Management attributed the performance to momentum in its distribution network, operational execution aided by AI tools, and the impact of the FEMA Review Council process on private flood insurance adoption.
Financial Performance
Revenue growth was supported by both record new business and a larger in-force premium base. Premium in force increased 32% to $419 million, while policies in force rose 29% to over 316,000. The company also reported a policy retention rate at renewal of 86%, up year-over-year, which management noted continues to drive top-line compounding.
| Metric | Q2 FY26 | Change (YoY) |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $55.9 million | +33% |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $34.5 million | +36% |
| Adjusted EBITDA Margin | 62% | +165 bps |
| Premium In Force | $419 million | +32% |
| Policies In Force | 316,000+ | +29% |
What the Numbers Show
Neptune Insurance’s business model demonstrates software-like scalability within the insurance sector. On a trailing twelve-month basis, revenue per employee reached a record $3 million, while adjusted EBITDA per employee hit $1.8 million. This efficiency is evident despite the company maintaining a headcount of approximately 59 employees, down slightly from a peak of 62. The data indicates that growth is being driven by technology and agent productivity rather than proportional increases in payroll, allowing margins to expand as revenue scales.
Operational Highlights & Strategy
Management emphasized that artificial intelligence is being used to enhance agent productivity rather than replace agents. The company launched Atlas, an AI tool integrated into the quote screen that assists agents in real-time. By the end of the quarter, nearly 3,700 agents had exchanged 33,000 messages with Atlas. A second phase, providing ranked task lists for agents, is scheduled to go live in the third quarter.
Underwriting performance remained strong, with the lifetime written loss ratio falling to 19.5%, a decrease of over 500 basis points from a year ago. This metric reflects eight storm seasons and 21 landfall hurricanes. Capacity providers renewed two largest programs on improved economic terms, with coverage limits increased to $15 million across all property types.
Balance Sheet & Capital Allocation
The company continued deleveraging efforts, finishing the quarter with $240 million drawn on its $260 million revolver, representing roughly 2.1 times trailing adjusted EBITDA. Post-quarter, the balance was paid down by $7 million to $233 million.
Capital returns included $26 million in stock repurchases during a secondary offering in May and a further $6 million in open market buybacks. The board has $94 million remaining under its $100 million repurchase authorization approved in April.
Outlook
Full-year guidance assumes a benign Atlantic hurricane season based on National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration projections. The outlook does not factor in potential benefits from future FEMA initiatives or broader changes to the National Flood Insurance Program. More than 55% of new business came from properties outside FEMA’s Special Flood Hazard Areas, signaling expansion into voluntary markets.
How might the upcoming Phase 2 rollout of the Atlas AI tool impact agent retention rates and further compress operational costs in FY27?
Given the heavy reliance on a benign hurricane season for guidance, what is Neptune's contingency plan if severe weather events disrupt the projected 60-61% EBITDA margin?
Could the shift toward voluntary markets (55% of new business outside SFHAs) expose Neptune to different underwriting risks compared to mandatory private flood insurance?































