NCLT Mumbai Approves New Resolution Professional for Supha Pharmachem Under CIRP
The NCLT Mumbai Bench approved Mr. Raju Mangilal Marshiya as Resolution Professional for Supha Pharmachem Limited under CIRP, replacing the IRP vide order dated April 30, 2026. The CoC, comprising solely Operational Creditors, passed the resolution with 67.28% aggregate voting share in their meeting on April 14, 2026. The revised CoC now includes six Operational Creditors, up from five earlier. The Board of Directors' powers remain suspended and vest with the newly appointed RP.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The Hon'ble National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench, has approved the appointment of Mr. Raju Mangilal Marshiya as the Resolution Professional (RP) for Supha Pharmachem Limited (formerly Remedium Lifecare Limited), replacing the erstwhile Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) under the ongoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The certified true copy of the NCLT order was received on May 11, 2026, following which Mr. Marshiya formally took over the conduct of the CIRP.
NCLT Order and CoC Resolution
The NCLT order, delivered on April 30, 2026, by Court-V of the Mumbai Bench, was passed in the matter of Boston Ivy Healthcare Solutions Private Limited versus Remedium Lifecare Limited under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The bench comprised Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Member (Judicial), and Sh. Charanjeet Singh Gulati, Member (Technical).
The application for replacement of the IRP was filed by one of the Operational Creditors, who is a member of the Committee of Creditors (CoC). Notably, the CoC in this case consists solely of Operational Creditors, as there are no Financial Creditors. The applicant holds a 48.84% voting share in the CoC. In the first CoC meeting held on April 14, 2026, the CoC passed a resolution to replace the IRP and appoint Mr. Raju Mangilal Marshiya as the new RP, with an aggregate voting share of 67.28% approving the said resolution.
Key Details of the Resolution Professional
The following details of the newly appointed Resolution Professional have been communicated to BSE Limited for record updation:
| Parameter: | Details |
|---|---|
| Name of RP: | Mr. Raju Mangilal Marshiya |
| IBBI Registration No.: | IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P-02849/2024-2025/14408 |
| AFA Valid Till: | 30.06.2026 |
| Email ID: | rmmar73@gmail.com |
| Appointment Order Date: | April 30, 2026 |
| Intimation Date: | May 11, 2026 |
| Place: | Pune |
CoC Reconstitution
In a separate application (IA/1763/2026), the IRP placed on record the report for the first re-constitution of the CoC along with the updated list of creditors. The revised CoC now consists of six (6) Operational Creditors, replacing the earlier composition of five (5) Operational Creditors. The updated list of creditors was taken on record by the NCLT.
Implications for the Company
With the NCLT's approval and Mr. Marshiya's assumption of duties as Resolution Professional, the powers of the Board of Directors of Supha Pharmachem Limited stand suspended and are vested with the RP, as is standard procedure under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The intimation of this change has been formally communicated to BSE Limited, requesting an update to their records and website to reflect the change in the Insolvency Professional.
Historical Stock Returns for Supha Pharmachem
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.70% | -5.26% | -18.18% | -66.67% | -78.18% | -38.98% |
With Mr. Marshiya's Authorization for Assignment (AFA) expiring on June 30, 2026, what happens to the CIRP process if a renewal or replacement is not secured before the deadline?
Given that the CoC consists entirely of Operational Creditors with no Financial Creditors, how might this unusual composition influence the resolution plan approval process and potential bidder interest in Supha Pharmachem?
What are the realistic prospects for finding a resolution applicant for Supha Pharmachem within the IBC-mandated timeline, given the company's pharmaceutical sector challenges and its history of name changes?


































