NCLAT orders status quo on Baron Infotech resolution plan appeal
- NCLAT Chennai passed an oral order on October 1, 2026, maintaining status quo on Baron Infotech's resolution plan.
- The order follows an appeal by unsuccessful applicant Vivek Kumar Ratakonda against the NCLT's September 8, 2026 approval.
- The tribunal adjourned the matter to November 3, 2026, for hearings by the Resolution Professional and Committee of Creditors.
- Baron Infotech stated that delays in appeal disposal will postpone the revival of the Corporate Debtor.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Chennai Bench, has passed an interim order directing that the status quo be maintained regarding the resolution plan of Baron Infotech Limited (under CIRP). This directive follows an appeal filed by Vivek Kumar Ratakonda, an unsuccessful resolution applicant, challenging the earlier approval granted by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Hyderabad Bench.
The appeal, registered as CA(AT) INS No. 516 of 2026, contests the NCLT's order dated September 8, 2026, which had approved the resolution plan submitted by M/s. Innopark (India) Private Limited. The NCLAT heard the appellant's submissions on October 1, 2026, and issued oral orders to maintain the existing situation until further hearings.
Hearing schedule and procedural status
The tribunal has adjourned the matter to November 3, 2026, to allow the Resolution Professional, the Committee of Creditors, and the Successful Resolution Applicant to present their arguments. The hearing window for these parties is set between November 3 and November 6, 2026.
As of the disclosure date, the written orders from the October 1, 2026 hearing have not been uploaded to the NCLAT website. The Resolution Professional has undertaken to share the formal order with the BSE once it becomes available.
Impact on corporate revival
Baron Infotech Limited currently has no active operations. The company disclosed that any delay in the disposal of this appeal will directly result in a delay in the revival of the Corporate Debtor. The status quo order remains effective until vacated by the NCLAT.
| Event | Date | Authority | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCLT Approval of Plan | September 8, 2026 | NCLT Hyderabad | Challenged |
| Appeal Filed | Not specified | NCLAT Chennai | Pending |
| Interim Order Passed | October 1, 2026 | NCLAT Chennai | Status Quo Maintained |
| Next Hearing | November 3, 2026 | NCLAT Chennai | Scheduled |
Regulatory compliance
The disclosure was made pursuant to Regulation 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The company stated it intends to take appropriate legal steps to protect the interests of its shareholders and stakeholders.
How might the delay in Baron Infotech's revival impact the recovery rates for its financial creditors under the CIRP framework?
What specific legal grounds did Vivek Kumar Ratakonda cite to challenge the NCLT's approval of Innopark's resolution plan?
Could the prolonged status quo order trigger delisting proceedings for Baron Infotech if operational revival remains stalled beyond regulatory timelines?

































