NCLAT extends interim stay on Hi-Tech Gears CIRP process
- NCLAT extended interim stay on Hi-Tech Gears CIRP process
- Stay continues from earlier order dated September 3, 2024
- Next hearing fixed for September 25, 2026
- Matter adjourned from August 17, 2026 due to paucity of time

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has extended the interim stay on the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) for The Hi-Tech Gears Ltd . The tribunal, in its order dated August 17, 2026, directed that the interim stay granted vide its earlier order dated September 3, 2024, shall continue.
The NCLAT principal bench in New Delhi listed the appeal for the next hearing on September 25, 2026. The matter was originally scheduled for hearing on August 17, 2026, but could not be taken up due to paucity of time.
Regulatory Context
The order pertains to Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1734 of 2024 and I.A. No. 2735 of 2025. The appellant is Naveen Jain, Company Secretary and shareholder of The Hi-Tech Gears Ltd., while the respondents are Happy Forgings Ltd. and another.
The tribunal bench consisted of Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma (Judicial Member), Arun Baroka (Technical Member), and Indevar Pandey (Technical Member). The interim order was passed in hybrid mode.
What the Numbers Show
The continuation of the interim stay implies that the insolvency proceedings remain suspended until further orders from the NCLAT. This maintains the status quo regarding the company’s corporate actions and operational control during the pendency of the appeal.
Historical Stock Returns for Hi-Tech Gears
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2.18% | +2.32% | +3.93% | -6.02% | -13.69% | +108.65% |
How might the prolonged suspension of CIRP proceedings impact The Hi-Tech Gears Ltd's ability to secure fresh credit or refinance existing debt?
What are the potential legal arguments Naveen Jain is likely to present at the September 25 hearing to justify the continued stay against Happy Forgings Ltd?
Could this extended insolvency pause trigger a broader review of corporate governance practices within the company by other stakeholders or regulators?


































