MPS Ltd receives unsolicited CRISIL ESG 64 (Strong) rating
- MPS Limited received an unsolicited CRISIL ESG 64 (Strong) rating
- Assessment based on FY26 disclosures and public domain data
- Company did not engage CRISIL ESG for the evaluation
- Disclosure made under SEBI LODR Regulation 30

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
MPS Limited received an unsolicited ESG rating of CRISIL ESG 64 (Strong) from CRISIL ESG Ratings & Analytics Limited on September 4, 2026. The assessment reflects the company’s environmental, social, and governance performance based on publicly available information.
The rating was assigned independently by CRISIL ESG, a SEBI-registered ESG Rating Provider. MPS Limited did not engage the agency for this evaluation. The assessment relies on disclosures made by the company for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, alongside other public data.
Regulatory Disclosure
The company issued the intimation pursuant to Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. This regulation mandates timely disclosure of material events to stock exchanges.
Rating Details
| Parameter | Detail |
|---|---|
| Rating Agency | CRISIL ESG Ratings & Analytics Limited |
| Rating Assigned | CRISIL ESG 64 (Strong) |
| Assessment Basis | FY26 disclosures and public data |
| Engagement Status | Unsolicited (No engagement) |
Piyush Jain, Company Secretary and Compliance Officer of MPS Limited, signed the disclosure. The notification was submitted to both the National Stock Exchange of India Limited and BSE Limited.
Historical Stock Returns for MPS
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.87% | -1.58% | -3.32% | +83.80% | +16.48% | 0.0% |
How might this 'Strong' ESG rating influence MPS Limited's cost of capital or access to green financing instruments in the near future?
Given the unsolicited nature of the assessment, will MPS Limited consider engaging CRISIL or other agencies for a solicited, in-depth ESG audit to validate these findings?
What specific operational changes or capital expenditures is MPS planning to implement to address potential gaps identified in the FY26 disclosures and aim for a higher rating tier?


































