Madhusudan Industries shareholders approve FY26 financials, reappoint directors
- Shareholders approved FY26 financials and reappointed directors with 97.84% support
- Promoters voted 100% in favour across all three resolutions
- Public non-institutional dissent stood at 30.02% of polled votes in that segment
- Total voter turnout was 60.43% with 3.25 million votes polled
- No institutional public shareholders participated in the voting process

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Madhusudan Industries shareholders approved the audited financial statements for FY26 and reappointed two directors at its 80th annual general meeting held on September 9, 2026. The resolutions passed with 97.84% support from votes polled.
Mr. Prem Chand Surana chaired the meeting in the absence of a permanent chairman. The company secretary confirmed that the requisite quorum was present and that statutory registers were available for online inspection. Parikh Dave & Associates served as the scrutinizer for the voting process.
Resolutions Passed
Members voted on ordinary and special business items. The auditors’ report and secretarial audit report contained no qualifications or adverse remarks. All three resolutions received identical voting patterns.
| Resolution Type | Item | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary | Adopt audited financials for FY26 | Passed |
| Ordinary | Reappointment of Mr. Premchand Surana | Passed |
| Special | Reappointment of Mr. Daarrpan Shah as Independent Director for second term | Passed |
Mr. Daarrpan Shah was reappointed for a second term of five years as an independent director. Mr. Premchand Surana, who retires by rotation, offered himself for reappointment and was approved by members.
Voting Breakdown
The company provided remote e-voting from September 6 to September 8, 2026. Members attending via video conference could also vote electronically during the meeting. There were 6,331 shareholders on the record date of September 2, 2026. A total of 52 shareholders attended via video conferencing: six from the promoter group and 46 from the public category.
Promoter and promoter group shareholders held 3,014,401 shares and voted 100% in favour of all resolutions. Public institutional shareholders held 10,089 shares but did not cast any votes. Public non-institutional shareholders held 2,350,510 shares; 233,777 votes were polled from this segment, representing a 9.95% participation rate.
| Category | Shares Held | Votes Polled | In Favour | Against |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter Group | 3,014,401 | 3,014,401 | 3,014,401 | 0 |
| Public Institutions | 10,089 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Public Non-Institutions | 2,350,510 | 233,777 | 163,602 | 70,175 |
| Total | 5,375,000 | 3,248,178 | 3,178,003 | 70,175 |
Overall, 3,248,178 votes were polled out of 5,375,000 outstanding shares, resulting in a 60.43% turnout. Of the votes polled, 97.84% were in favour and 2.16% were against across all resolutions. The dissenting votes originated entirely from the public non-institutional segment, where 30.02% of polled votes were cast against the proposals.
No questions were raised by shareholders during the session. The meeting concluded at 12:00 pm.
Historical Stock Returns for Madhusudan Industries
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -4.35% | -3.65% | +4.09% | +23.10% | -16.92% | +36.38% |
How might the 30% dissent rate among public non-institutional shareholders impact Madhusudan Industries' future investor relations strategies and corporate governance transparency?
What specific financial performance metrics in the FY26 audited statements likely contributed to the strong promoter support despite notable public sector dissent?
Could the complete absence of voting from public institutional shareholders signal a broader trend of disengagement or specific concerns regarding the company's strategic direction?































