Khaitan India AGM resolutions pass with 99.97% votes in favour
- Khaitan (India) Limited passed both AGM resolutions with 99.97% votes in favour
- Promoter group voted 2,762,405 shares unanimously for both resolutions
- Public non-institutional shareholders cast 814 and 815 votes against Resolutions 1 and 2 respectively
- Total votes polled stood at 2,784,950 out of 4,750,000 outstanding shares

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Khaitan (India) Limited held its 89th Annual General Meeting on September 25, 2026, through video conferencing, with both resolutions passing with 99.97% votes in favour.
Meeting proceedings and attendance
The meeting commenced at 11:30 am and concluded at 12:10 pm. A total of 108 members participated in the session. The Chairman, Sunay Krishna Khaitan, confirmed the presence of a quorum and introduced the directors and auditors present through video conferencing.
Key attendees included:
| Name | Role |
|---|---|
| Sunay Krishna Khaitan | Whole Time Director and Chairman |
| Gopal Mor | Independent Director and Chairman of Audit Committee |
| Pooja Kalanouria | Independent Director |
| Ayushi Khaitan | Independent Director |
| Sumit Pasari | Chief Financial Officer |
The Statutory Auditor, Biswajit Datta from M/S. K.C. Bhattacharjee & Paul LLP, was absent due to unavailability, with his absence approved by the Chairman. The Secretarial Auditor, V.P. Rajeev, and the Scrutinizer, Gouri Shanker Mishra, attended the meeting.
Financial review and business updates
During the address, the Chairman outlined the company's performance for FY26, highlighting key operational shifts. The management discussed the suspension of the Sugar Division and expansion efforts in the Electrical Goods sector. The Chief Financial Officer read out qualifications and observations from the Independent Auditor's Report and the Secretarial Auditor's Report, noting that the Board had already provided explanations in the Directors' Report.
Voting and resolutions
Remote e-voting was facilitated through CDSL from September 22, 2026, to September 24, 2026. Shareholders holding equity shares as on the cut-off date of September 18, 2026 were entitled to vote. Members attending through video conferencing who had not voted via remote e-voting were permitted to cast their vote during the meeting, with the Chairman allowing e-voting within 30 minutes of the meeting's conclusion. Gouri Shankar Mishra, Partner at BGS Mishra & Associates, Company Secretaries LLP, served as the Scrutinizer pursuant to Section 108 of the Companies Act, 2013.
The following resolutions were transacted:
- Ordinary Business: Adoption of the Audited Financial Statements for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, along with the reports of the Auditors and Directors.
- Special Business: Re-appointment of Gopal Mor as an Independent Director for a second term.
Scrutinizer's report: voting results
The consolidated scrutinizer's report, submitted by Gouri Shankar Mishra on September 25, 2026, confirmed the outcome of both resolutions based on data obtained from the CDSL e-voting system.
Resolution 1: Adoption of audited financial statements (Ordinary Resolution)
| Particulars | No. of members | No. of shares |
|---|---|---|
| Total remote e-voting | 148 | 2784189 |
| Total meeting e-voting | 2 | 761 |
| Invalid remote e-votes | 0 | 0 |
| Invalid meeting e-votes | 0 | 0 |
| In favour (remote e-voting) | 143 | 2784134 |
| In favour (meeting e-voting) | 1 | 2 |
| Against (remote e-voting) | 5 | 55 |
| Against (meeting e-voting) | 1 | 759 |
| Total in favour (consolidated) | 144 | 2784136 |
| Total against (consolidated) | 6 | 814 |
| % in favour | 99.97% |
The resolution received the requisite majority and was passed as an Ordinary Resolution.
Resolution 2: Re-appointment of Gopal Mor as Independent Director (Special Resolution)
| Particulars | No. of members | No. of shares |
|---|---|---|
| Total remote e-voting | 148 | 2784189 |
| Total meeting e-voting | 2 | 761 |
| Invalid remote e-votes | 0 | 0 |
| Invalid meeting e-votes | 0 | 0 |
| In favour (remote e-voting) | 142 | 2784133 |
| In favour (meeting e-voting) | 1 | 2 |
| Against (remote e-voting) | 6 | 56 |
| Against (meeting e-voting) | 1 | 759 |
| Total in favour (consolidated) | 143 | 2784135 |
| Total against (consolidated) | 7 | 815 |
| % in favour | 99.97% |
The resolution received the requisite majority and was passed as a Special Resolution.
Detailed voting breakdown by shareholder category
The SEBI (LODR) compliant filing provides a granular view of how different shareholder categories voted. The promoter group held 2,861,630 shares and voted 2,762,405 shares via e-voting for both resolutions, resulting in a 100% approval rate from this group. Public institutions held 1,234 shares but did not participate in the voting.
Public non-institutional shareholders held 1,887,136 shares. For Resolution 1, they voted 22,545 shares, with 21,731 in favour and 814 against. For Resolution 2, they voted 22,545 shares, with 21,730 in favour and 815 against. The slight variation in votes against between the two resolutions indicates a marginal shift in dissent among public shareholders regarding the director re-appointment compared to the financial statement adoption.
| Category | Shares Held | Votes Polled | Votes In Favour | Votes Against | % In Favour |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter Group (Res 1) | 2,861,630 | 2,762,405 | 2,762,405 | 0 | 100.00% |
| Public Non-Institutional (Res 1) | 1,887,136 | 22,545 | 21,731 | 814 | 96.39% |
| Total (Res 1) | 4,750,000 | 2,784,950 | 2,784,136 | 814 | 99.97% |
| Promoter Group (Res 2) | 2,861,630 | 2,762,405 | 2,762,405 | 0 | 100.00% |
| Public Non-Institutional (Res 2) | 1,887,136 | 22,545 | 21,730 | 815 | 96.39% |
| Total (Res 2) | 4,750,000 | 2,784,950 | 2,784,135 | 815 | 99.97% |
What the numbers show
The voting data reveals a significant concentration of power in the hands of the promoter group. While the overall approval rating stands at 99.97%, this is heavily driven by the promoter group, which voted 2,762,405 shares unanimously in favour. The public non-institutional shareholders, who voted only 22,545 shares out of their holding of 1,887,136, registered the entirety of the dissenting votes (814 and 815 shares respectively). This suggests that while the institutional and retail base is largely disengaged or low-participation, the small segment that did vote showed a roughly 3.6% dissent rate against both resolutions.
Historical Stock Returns for Khaitan
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.55% | +0.68% | -5.62% | +34.32% | +15.18% | 0.0% |
What specific capital expenditure plans are in place to support the expansion of the Electrical Goods sector following the suspension of the Sugar Division?
How will the company address the auditor qualifications and secretarial observations to ensure clean audit reports for FY27?
What strategic measures is management taking to improve low retail shareholder participation and engagement given the current voting trends?


































