Inventure Growth & Securities held its Thirty First Annual General Meeting on September 29, 2026, via Video Conferencing. The meeting saw the approval of key leadership reappointments and the adoption of financial statements for FY26.

Key resolutions passed

The shareholders approved several critical items during the virtual meeting, which commenced at 11:30 am and concluded by 11:55 am. The proceedings were conducted in accordance with the Companies Act, 2013 and SEBI Listing Regulations, 2015.

Voting details

The company disclosed detailed voting results pursuant to Regulation 44(3) of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. A total of 297,684,182 valid votes were polled across all resolutions, representing 28.35% of the outstanding shares.

For the adoption of standalone and consolidated audited financial statements for FY26, 99.9991% of the votes polled were in favour. Only 2,603 votes were cast against this resolution.

Regarding the re-appointment of Kanji Bachubhai Rita, who retires by rotation, 99.9976% of the votes polled supported the ordinary resolution. Similarly, his re-appointment as Chairman and Managing Director via special resolution received 99.9976% support. The re-appointment of Surji Damji Chheda as Independent Director also secured 99.9976% of the votes polled.

Promoter and promoter group entities voted 100% in favour across all four resolutions. Among public non-institutional holders, who constituted the bulk of the voting public, support ranged between 99.9658% and 99.9873% depending on the specific resolution.

Meeting proceedings and governance

Kanji Rita, the Executive Chairman, chaired the meeting after confirming the requisite quorum. Shikha Mishra, Company Secretary and Compliance Officer, informed members that the statutory auditor's reports contained no qualifications or adverse comments. Consequently, these reports were not read aloud during the session.

The company utilized MUFG Intime India Private Limited to facilitate the virtual meeting and voting processes. Remote e-voting was open from September 24, 2026, to September 28, 2026. For attendees who did not vote remotely, an e-voting facility remained available during the AGM for 30 minutes after the conclusion of speeches.

Scrutiny and compliance

Dharmesh Zaveri of D.M. Zaveri & Co, a practicing company secretary, served as the scrutinizer. He was responsible for overseeing the e-voting process and submitting a consolidated report to the stock exchanges shortly after the meeting. The statutory registers were made available for inspection electronically, allowing members to access them via email request.

The Sole Arbitrator has rejected Inventure Growth & Securities 's application challenging the tribunal's jurisdiction in an ongoing arbitration proceeding. The order, dated September 3, 2026, holds the company a "veritable party" to the dispute arising from an August 13, 2014, share sale agreement.

The company had filed the application under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arguing it was a non-signatory to the underlying agreement. The arbitrator rejected this claim based on performance obligations and surrounding facts, citing Supreme Court principles including Cox and Kings Ltd.

Procedural Developments

A hearing held on September 5, 2026, addressed the Claimant's application for the production of documents. The company's counsel strongly opposed the request on grounds of burden of proof and limitation. The arbitrator observed that the matter requires further consideration in light of references to an alleged separate arrangement or agreement.

The next hearing has been scheduled for further arguments. The issue of limitation has been kept open to be tried alongside the main issues in the arbitration, applying Order XIV Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Case Details

What the Numbers Show

The disclosure explicitly states there is no direct, immediate adverse financial or operational impact on the company arising solely from this order. This indicates the current proceedings are strictly procedural, focusing on jurisdictional maintainability rather than quantified claims on merits, which remain subject to final trial.