Indian Toners & Developers Submits Q4 FY26 Dematerialization Compliance Report to BSE
Indian Toners & Developers Ltd filed its Q4 FY26 quarterly compliance report under SEBI regulations, covering dematerialization activities through NSDL and CDSL depositories. The disclosure confirmed proper processing of securities received from depository participants, with detailed transaction data showing varied acceptance and rejection patterns across both depositories during the quarter ended 31.03.2026.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Indian toners & developers Ltd has filed its quarterly compliance report with BSE Limited, fulfilling regulatory requirements under SEBI (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 2018. The disclosure covers dematerialization activities for the quarter ended 31.03.2026, providing comprehensive transaction details across major depositories.
Regulatory Compliance Framework
The company submitted its disclosure under Regulation 74(5) of SEBI (DP) Regulations, 2018, confirming that all securities received from depository participants during the quarter were properly verified and processed. Indian Toners & Developers confirmed that the securities comprised in the certificates have been listed on BSE, where the company's earlier issued securities are already listed.
The company also verified that security certificates received for dematerialization were mutilated and cancelled after due verification by depository participants, with depositories' names substituted in the register of members as registered owners within stipulated time limits.
NSDL Dematerialization Activity
The NSDL demat operations during Q4 FY26 showed varied processing patterns across different dates. The quarter recorded multiple dematerialization requests with mixed acceptance and rejection rates.
| Date | Total Requests | Total Shares | Accepted Requests | Accepted Shares | Rejected Requests | Rejected Shares |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/01/2026 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100 |
| 08/01/2026 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| 05/02/2026 | 2 | 200 | 2 | 200 | 0 | 0 |
| 09/03/2026 | 3 | 300 | 3 | 300 | 0 | 0 |
| 26/03/2026 | 1 | 200 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 200 |
The NSDL operations covered transfer numbers ranging from 14049 to 14060 for successfully processed requests, indicating systematic transaction tracking and record maintenance.
CDSL Transaction Overview
CDSL dematerialization activities during the same period demonstrated different processing volumes and patterns compared to NSDL operations.
| Date | Total Requests | Total Shares | Accepted Requests | Accepted Shares | Rejected Requests | Rejected Shares |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/01/2026 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| 02/02/2026 | 5 | 700 | 4 | 600 | 1 | 100 |
| 19/03/2026 | 2 | 200 | 2 | 200 | 0 | 0 |
| 27/01/2026 | 2 | 300 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 200 |
CDSL transfer numbers ranged from 102955 to 102967 for accepted transactions, maintaining separate numbering sequences from NSDL operations.
Corporate Governance and Documentation
The disclosure was signed by Vishesh Chaturvedi, Company Secretary & Compliance Officer (ACS 23718), demonstrating proper corporate governance protocols. All documentation was digitally signed and submitted with appropriate enclosures as required under the regulations.
The company operates from its corporate office at 1223, DLF Tower B, Jasola, New Delhi, and maintains its status as a government-recognized Export House with CIN L47613UP1990PLC015721.
Historical Stock Returns for Indian Toners & Developers
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3.07% | +0.84% | +0.99% | -10.11% | -10.80% | +81.75% |
What factors might be driving the rejection rates in dematerialization requests, and how could this impact investor confidence in the company's share transfer processes?
How might the company's export house status and toner industry positioning affect its capital market activities and future fundraising plans?
Will the observed patterns in NSDL versus CDSL processing volumes indicate a shift in investor preferences between depositories for this stock?


































