Grandma Trading clarifies delay in CFO appointment; posts Q1FY27 profit
Grandma Trading & Agencies Limited addressed a regulatory query regarding the delayed disclosure of Mr. Avdhesh Chaurasiya's appointment as Whole-Time Director and CFO, citing an inadvertent error in the effective date. The board approved the five-year appointment effective August 13, 2026. Financially, the company reported a net profit of ₹1.61 lakh for Q1FY27, turning around from a loss of ₹5.95 lakh in Q1FY26, supported by operational revenue of ₹12.66 lakh.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Grandma Trading & Agencies Limited has clarified with the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) that the delay in disclosing the appointment of Mr. Avdhesh Chaurasiya as Whole-Time Director and Chief Financial Officer was inadvertent. The company stated there was no intention to withhold material information from stakeholders or the exchange.
The Board of Directors approved Mr. Chaurasiya’s re-designation as Whole-Time Director and CFO on August 13, 2026, for a five-year term ending August 12, 2031, subject to shareholder approval. The company had initially filed the outcome of the board meeting on August 13, 2026, but incorrectly listed the effective date as August 1, 2026. The correct effective date is August 13, 2026. The company attributed the oversight to a procedural error and confirmed it has strengthened internal compliance processes to prevent future delays.
Financial Results for Q1FY27
During the same board meeting, directors approved the unaudited financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. The company reported a net profit of ₹1.61 lakh, a significant improvement from the net loss of ₹5.95 lakh reported in the corresponding quarter of FY25.
Revenue from operations stood at ₹12.66 lakh for the quarter, compared to nil in the same period last year. Total revenue remained at ₹12.66 lakh, as other income was negligible. Total expenditure decreased to ₹11.05 lakh from ₹5.98 lakh in Q1FY25, driven primarily by changes in inventory levels and purchase costs.
| Metric | Q1FY27 (Unaudited) | Q1FY26 (Unaudited) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations: | ₹12.66 lakh | ₹0.00 lakh | New Revenue |
| Total Expenditure: | ₹11.05 lakh | ₹5.98 lakh | Increased |
| Net Profit / (Loss): | ₹1.61 lakh | -₹5.95 lakh | Turnaround |
| Basic EPS (Rs.): | 0.001 | -0.005 | Improved |
The statutory auditors, M/s. Singhvi & Sancheti, issued a limited review report on the financial statements. The review was conducted in accordance with Standard on Review Engagement (SRE) 2410. The auditors stated that nothing came to their attention to cause them to believe the statement did not disclose information required under Regulation 33 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
What the Numbers Show
The company’s return to profitability in Q1FY27 coincides with the resumption of operational revenue, which was nil in the prior year’s corresponding quarter. While total expenditure increased year-on-year due to higher purchases of stock-in-trade (₹10.06 lakh vs ₹6.27 lakh), this was offset by a favorable change in inventories of finished goods (-₹4.79 lakh vs -₹6.27 lakh), indicating improved inventory management or sales realization relative to costs incurred.
The company noted that its petition for the reduction of paid-up capital is pending final hearing before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The paid-up equity share capital remains at ₹1306.00 lakh.
Historical Stock Returns for GRANDMA
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2.56% | +2.56% | +29.03% | -18.37% | -18.37% | -88.02% |
How might the pending NCLT hearing on the reduction of paid-up capital impact the company's liquidity and future fundraising capabilities?
What specific operational strategies is the new CFO, Mr. Avdhesh Chaurasiya, expected to implement to sustain the profitability turnaround seen in Q1FY27?
Will the recent procedural error in disclosure lead to any regulatory scrutiny or penalties from SEBI despite the company's claim of inadvertence?






























