Godrej Properties appeals MoEFCC revocation of Godrej Eternia clearance
- MoEFCC revoked Environmental Clearance for Godrej Eternia on September 30, 2026
- Godrej Properties appealed to the National Green Tribunal, denying violations
- Project located 6.6 km from Sukhna Wildlife Sanctuary, outside the 2.75 km ESZ limit
- Revocation alleged lack of NBWL clearance, which company states was not required

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Godrej Properties Limited has filed an appeal with the National Green Tribunal (NGT) challenging the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change’s (MoEFCC) decision to revoke the Environmental Clearance (EC) for its commercial building project, Godrej Eternia, in Chandigarh.
The company received the revocation letter dated September 30, 2026, and contends that the action proceeds on an erroneous premise. Godrej Properties asserts that it acted in strict accordance with approvals granted by competent authorities and remains confident in its legal position regarding the matter.
Basis for Revocation and Company Defense
The MoEFCC revoked the clearance alleging that the project falls within 10 km of the Sukhna Wildlife Sanctuary, thereby requiring clearance from the Standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL), which was not obtained. The company denies this allegation, stating that the original EC never mandated NBWL clearance for this specific project.
Godrej Properties highlighted a Gazette Notification by the Union Territory of Chandigarh dated January 18, 2017, which conclusively notified the final limits of the Environmentally Sensitive Zone (ESZ) as extending up to a maximum of 2.75 km from the boundary of the Sukhna Wildlife Sanctuary. The company noted that Godrej Eternia is located 6.6 km from that boundary, placing it more than twice the notified limit and clearly outside the ESZ. Consequently, the company argues that the question of NBWL clearance does not arise.
Project Compliance and Legal Status
The revocation comes ten years after the project was completed with all requisite approvals. The company emphasized its full compliance with the conditions of the EC at all times and stated that it has acted in good faith. The matter is currently sub judice before the NGT.
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Authority | Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change |
| Action | Revocation of Environmental Clearance |
| Project | Godrej Eternia, Chandigarh |
| Date of Receipt | September 30, 2026 |
| Alleged Violation | Lack of NBWL clearance due to proximity to Sukhna Wildlife Sanctuary |
| Company Response | Appealed to National Green Tribunal; denies violation |
What the Numbers Show
The core divergence lies in the distance metrics cited in the regulatory dispute. The MoEFCC’s action relies on a general 10 km proximity rule to the wildlife sanctuary, while the company’s defense hinges on the specific statutory definition of the Environmentally Sensitive Zone (ESZ) notified by the local administration. With the ESZ limit fixed at 2.75 km and the project situated at 6.6 km, the company maintains a buffer of nearly 4 km beyond the legally defined sensitive zone, arguing this renders the NBWL clearance requirement moot.
Historical Stock Returns for Godrej Properties
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.01% | -6.55% | -21.35% | +8.46% | -18.95% | -30.97% |
How might the NGT's ruling on the Godrej Eternia case impact the legal precedent for other real estate projects located near wildlife sanctuaries across India?
What are the potential financial implications for Godrej Properties if the revocation is upheld, particularly regarding liability for a project completed ten years ago?
Could this dispute trigger a broader regulatory review of Environmentally Sensitive Zone (ESZ) notifications in other Union Territories and states?


































