eClerx Services files FY26 BRSR report with SEBI
eClerx Services Limited filed its FY26 BRSR report, detailing ESG performance including 73% renewable energy usage and reduced GHG emissions. The report covers workforce demographics, safety records, and governance certifications, assured by TÜV SÜD South Asia Private Limited.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
eClerx Services Limited has filed its Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report (BRSR) for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, with the Bombay Stock Exchange and the National Stock Exchange of India. The submission, made under Regulation 34(2)(f) of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, details the company’s adherence to responsible business conduct principles across environmental, social, and governance domains.
The report covers operations at eClerx’s Indian offices in Mumbai, Pune, Chandigarh, Mohali, Gurugram, and Coimbatore. It highlights key metrics including total energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, water usage, and waste management practices. Additionally, the document provides insights into employee well-being, diversity initiatives, and stakeholder engagement processes.
Environmental Performance
eClerx reported a total energy consumption of 5,18,20,214 MJ for FY26, comprising 3,78,10,884 MJ from renewable sources and 1,40,09,330 MJ from non-renewable sources. This represents an increase from 4,72,42,340 MJ in FY25. The company noted that 73% of its electricity consumption across India operations was derived from renewable sources.
Greenhouse gas emissions for Scope 1 and Scope 2 totaled 3,676 tCO2e, down from 4,519 tCO2e in the previous year. Water withdrawal stood at 1,04,448 kiloliters, entirely sourced from third parties as the company operates from leased facilities. All office spaces adhere to Zero Liquid Discharge practices, with wastewater treated and reused for domestic applications.
| Metric | FY26 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Total Energy Consumption (MJ) | 5,18,20,214 | 4,72,42,340 |
| Renewable Energy Share (%) | 73% | Not specified |
| Scope 1 & 2 GHG Emissions (tCO2e) | 3,676 | 4,519 |
| Water Withdrawal (KL) | 1,04,448 | 86,722 |
Social and Governance Highlights
The company reported a total workforce of 18,166 employees in India, with 35% being female. Permanent employees constituted 12,641 individuals, while non-permanent staff numbered 5,525. The turnover rate for permanent employees was 37.59% in FY26, compared to 38.20% in FY25.
eClerx maintains several international certifications, including ISO 27001:2022 for information security, ISO 14001 for environmental management, and SA8000 for social accountability. The company also holds ISO 42001 certification for artificial intelligence management systems.
Stakeholder Engagement
Grievance data indicates 26 complaints received from shareholders during FY26, primarily concerning non-receipt of dividend and buyback offer letters, with one case pending resolution. Employee-related grievances included 7 sexual harassment complaints, one of which remained pending. No fines or penalties were reported by regulatory agencies during the period.
The report was assured by TÜV SÜD South Asia Private Limited, which provided limited assurance on the BRSR core attributes and selected non-financial disclosures. Srinivasan Nadadhur, Chief Financial Officer, serves as the contact person for queries regarding the report.
Historical Stock Returns for eClerx Services
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.54% | +4.51% | +7.60% | +1.89% | -7.49% | +143.39% |
How might eClerx's 73% renewable energy share influence its competitiveness in securing contracts with multinational clients prioritizing Scope 3 emission reductions?
Given the high permanent employee turnover rate of 37.59%, what strategic initiatives is eClerx planning to implement to improve retention and reduce recruitment costs in FY27?
What are the projected financial implications of maintaining ISO 42001 certification as regulatory scrutiny on AI governance intensifies globally?


































