Clearwater Paper Q2 EBITDA turns negative on price pressure
Clearwater Paper's Q2 2026 results show a net loss of $21 million and negative Adjusted EBITDA of $(8) million, driven by a 9% decline in average selling prices and timing of maintenance outages, despite an 8% rise in sales volumes. The company reduced net debt by $59 million through working capital improvements.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Clearwater Paper Corporation (NYSE: CLW) reported a net loss of $21 million, or $1.33 per diluted share, for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026, marking a sharp deterioration from net income of $3 million in the same period last year. The results were driven by Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations turning negative at $(8) million, compared to positive $40 million in Q2 2025, as lower market pricing and the timing of major maintenance outages outweighed an 8% increase in sales volumes. This structural shift in profitability underscores intensifying headwinds in the solid bleached sulfate (SBS) paperboard sector, where average net selling prices fell 9% to $1,077 per ton despite strong volume gains.
The company’s net sales reached $375 million, down from $392 million in Q2 2025, reflecting the inability of volume growth to fully compensate for the decline in average realized prices. President and Chief Executive Officer Arsen Kitch attributed the operational challenges to the timing of the planned major maintenance outage at the Lewiston, Idaho facility, which occurred in Q2 2026 instead of Q3 2025, alongside reduced sales prices. The Lewiston outage was completed on time and on target at a direct cost of $22 million. Additionally, Clearwater Paper restructured its Cypress Bend, Arkansas facility, reducing approximately 20% of roles with expected annual savings of $8 million to $12 million.
Financial Performance Metrics
| Metric | Q2 2026 | Q2 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Sales | $375 million | $392 million | Decrease |
| Net Income (Loss) | $(21) million | $3 million | Loss Widened |
| Diluted EPS | $(1.33) | $0.17 | Decline |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $(8) million | $40 million | Turned Negative |
| Sales Volume | 328,722 tons | 304,713 tons | Increase 8% |
| Avg Net Selling Price | $1,077 per ton | $1,182 per ton | Decrease 9% |
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between volume growth and profitability highlights a challenging pricing environment for Clearwater Paper. While the company successfully increased sales volumes by 8% to 328,722 tons, indicating maintained or improved market share with key strategic customers, the 9% drop in average net selling prices to $1,077 per ton severely compressed margins. This price erosion, combined with the one-time impact of the Lewiston maintenance outage, pushed Adjusted EBITDA into negative territory. The six-month period showed similar trends, with Adjusted EBITDA at $(6) million versus $70 million in the prior year, further impacted by a weather event in Q1 2026. Management noted early signs of improvement in SBS industry conditions, including lower imports and increased operating rates, but emphasized that current pricing remains below levels necessary to generate acceptable returns.
Balance Sheet and Cash Flow
Despite the operational losses, Clearwater Paper strengthened its balance sheet by reducing net debt by $59 million during the quarter and $50 million year-to-date. This reduction was driven by net working capital improvements, tax refunds, and additional representation and warranty insurance proceeds. Cash and cash equivalents rose to $95.4 million as of June 30, 2026, from $30.7 million at the end of FY2025. Net debt stood at $266.8 million, down from $316.7 million at year-end. The company generated $69.0 million in net cash flows from operating activities in Q2, primarily due to a $27.4 million decrease in accounts receivable and a $7.0 million decrease in inventories, offsetting the net loss.
How sustainable is the $8 million to $12 million in annual cost savings from the Cypress Bend restructuring, and will these efficiencies be sufficient to offset current pricing pressures?
Given that management cited lower imports as a positive sign, what specific regulatory or market shifts are driving this decline, and how quickly might it translate into price recovery for SBS paperboard?
With net debt reduced by $59 million in Q2, what is Clearwater Paper's strategic plan for capital allocation in the near term—specifically regarding further debt reduction versus potential M&A activity?




























