Brady & Morris adopts FY26 financials, approves RPT at 80th AGM
- All three ordinary resolutions passed with requisite majority at the 80th AGM
- FY26 financial statements adopted with 1,824,396 votes in favour
- Material RPT with W. H. Brady And Company Limited approved by non-promoter shareholders
- Promoter votes excluded from RPT resolution as per SEBI LODR regulations

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Brady & Morris Engineering Company Limited held its 80th Annual General Meeting on September 26, 2026, through video conferencing. Members adopted the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026, and approved material related party transactions.
The meeting, conducted under SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, saw 22 members attend virtually. Chairman Pavan G. Morarka presided over the session, noting that the statutory registers were available for electronic inspection upon request.
Key resolutions passed
The shareholders approved several key items of business as ordinary resolutions:
- Adoption of audited financial statements for FY26, including the balance sheet, profit and loss account, and cash flow statement.
- Re-appointment of Pavan G. Morarka as a director retiring by rotation.
- Approval of material related party transactions with W. H. Brady And Company Limited under Regulation 23 of SEBI LODR regulations.
Voting and attendance details
The company utilized CDSL’s platform for remote e-voting and live voting during the meeting. The remote voting period ran from September 23 to September 25, 2026. Three directors, Pinaki Misra, Chitralekha Hiremath, and Yash Shah, communicated their inability to attend the meeting.
The scrutinizer, Himank Desai, a chartered accountant, oversaw the voting process. The final voting results and scrutinizer’s report have been published on the company website and communicated to the Bombay Stock Exchange.
Scrutinizer's report details
The Consolidated Scrutinizer Report submitted to the BSE confirmed that all three ordinary resolutions were passed with requisite majority. The report detailed the vote counts across remote e-voting and live e-voting at the AGM.
For Item No. 1 (Adoption of Financial Statements) and Item No. 2 (Re-appointment of Director), the results were identical:
| Resolution | Votes in Favour | Votes Against | Invalid Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Item 1: Adopt FY26 Financials | 1,824,396 | 4,447 | 0 |
| Item 2: Re-appoint Pavan G. Morarka | 1,824,396 | 4,447 | 0 |
For Item No. 3 (Approval of Material RPT with W. H. Brady And Company Limited), promoter votes were excluded as they are considered interested parties under Regulation 23 of SEBI LODR. Consequently, the valid vote count was significantly lower:
| Resolution | Votes in Favour | Votes Against | Invalid Votes (Promoter) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Item 3: Approve Material RPT | 159,767 | 4,447 | 1,664,629 |
The scrutinizer noted that for the related party transaction resolution, only public non-institutional shareholders cast valid votes, with 97.29% voting in favour. Public institutions did not cast any votes on this item.
Historical Stock Returns for Brady & Morris Engineering
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.08% | -1.28% | -8.71% | -17.42% | -47.44% | +427.31% |
How will the approved material related party transactions with W. H. Brady And Company Limited impact Brady & Morris Engineering's future revenue visibility and operational independence?
What are the implications of the significant promoter voting exclusion on minority shareholder influence regarding future related party dealings?
Given the low institutional participation in the RPT vote, how might this affect the company's attractiveness to large-cap funds in upcoming quarters?


































