Fujiyama Power Systems Clarifies Delay in BIS Seizure Disclosure to Stock Exchange
Fujiyama Power Systems provided clarification to BSE regarding delayed disclosure of BIS seizure operation at its Greater Noida facility on March 24, 2026. The company explained that the delay was unintentional and occurred due to preliminary information, need for legal assessment, and awaiting formal BIS communication before making suo motu disclosure.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Fujiyama Power Systems Limited has provided clarification to BSE regarding the delay in disclosing a search and seizure operation conducted by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) at its Greater Noida facility. The regulatory action, which took place on March 24, 2026, resulted in the seizure of company products valued at ₹2.52 crores.
Details of the BIS Operation
The search and seizure operation was conducted at the company's facility located at Plot No. 51-52, Sector Ecotech1, Ecotech, extension-1, Greater Noida. During the surprise visit, BIS officials seized certain products worth ₹2.52 crores and took product samples, alleging non-compliance with BIS standard mark requirements under Section 28 of the BIS Act, 2016.
| Parameter: | Details |
|---|---|
| Authority: | Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) |
| Date of Operation: | March 24, 2026 |
| Location: | Greater Noida facility |
| Value of Seized Products: | ₹2.52 crores |
| Alleged Violation: | Section 28 of BIS Act, 2016 |
| Disclosure Date: | April 08, 2026 |
Company's Clarification on Disclosure Delay
In response to BSE's query regarding the delayed disclosure under Regulation 30 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, Fujiyama Power Systems explained that the information available immediately after the surprise visit was preliminary and incomplete. The company was awaiting formal communication from BIS outlining the proposed course of action.
Company Secretary and Compliance Officer Mayuri Gupta stated that the company undertook an internal assessment in consultation with legal advisors to evaluate the implications, including the materiality of the event. The delay occurred due to the need to verify facts, assess materiality, and await official confirmation from the regulatory authority.
Legal Assessment and Transparency Measures
The company emphasized that the delay was neither intentional nor deliberate. After waiting for formal communication from BIS within a reasonable time and receiving none, Fujiyama Power Systems proceeded to make the disclosure to stock exchanges on a suo motu basis to ensure transparency and avoid further delay.
| Aspect: | Company's Position |
|---|---|
| Nature of Delay: | Unintentional, due to fact verification |
| Legal Consultation: | Conducted with advisors |
| Materiality Assessment: | Internal evaluation undertaken |
| Transparency Commitment: | Suo motu disclosure made |
Operational Impact and Compliance
According to the company's previous disclosure, there is no material impact on financials, operations, or other activities arising from the BIS action, except for the seized products worth ₹2.52 crores. The company has maintained that its manufacturing and business operations continue without disruption.
Fujiyama Power Systems reiterated its commitment to timely and transparent disclosures in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. The company continues to cooperate with BIS officials and is seeking appropriate legal counsel for the release of the seized products.
Historical Stock Returns for Fujiyama Power Systems
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.20% | +9.46% | +24.22% | +6.24% | +6.24% | +6.24% |
What potential penalties or sanctions could Fujiyama Power Systems face if found guilty of violating BIS standard mark requirements?
How might this BIS investigation affect Fujiyama Power Systems' ability to secure new contracts or maintain existing client relationships?
Will this regulatory action prompt increased scrutiny of other power systems manufacturers for BIS compliance violations?


































