Asia Broadband urges GoldAxis users to move assets amid provider switch
- Asia Broadband Inc. urges all GoldAxis Wallet users to transfer digital assets to independent self-custody wallets
- The transition stems from operational reliability issues and significant delays in Phase 2 development
- Specific guidance provided for Algorand-based tokens (AABBG, AABBS) and major cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH
- Management warns users never to share seed phrases or private keys with anyone claiming to offer migration assistance

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Asia Broadband Inc. (OTC: AABB) has advised all GoldAxis Wallet users to transfer their digital assets to independent self-custody wallets. The company announced the transition to a new service provider on August 28, 2026, citing operational reliability concerns.
The move follows a comprehensive review of the current wallet technology infrastructure. Management identified several operational and reliability problems over recent months. Additionally, the development of Phase 2 of the GoldAxis Wallet encountered delays that exceeded company expectations. These issues raised concerns regarding timelines and execution quality, prompting the decision to switch providers to ensure future platform reliability.
Migration Instructions
Users are strongly recommended to transfer assets as soon as possible. The company provided specific guidance for different asset types:
- Algorand Blockchain Assets: Users holding AABBG, AABBS, and ALGO should consider creating an independent Algorand-compatible self-custody wallet, such as Pera Wallet.
- Bitcoin and Ethereum: Users holding BTC, ETH, and other compatible cryptocurrencies can use proven multi-asset self-custody wallets like Exodus or other compatible options.
Before transferring, users must ensure the destination wallet is compatible with their specific digital assets and blockchain. The company recommends making a small test transfer to verify successful receipt before moving the remaining balance.
Security Warnings
Asia Broadband emphasized that GoldAxis, Asia Broadband, and their representatives will never ask for seed phrases, recovery phrases, private keys, PINs, or passwords. Users are warned against providing these credentials to anyone claiming to assist with migration. The company clarified that third-party wallet applications like Pera Wallet and Exodus are independent of Asia Broadband. Users remain solely responsible for choosing and safely operating any third-party self-custody wallet.
Chris Torres, President and CEO of Asia Broadband, stated that the transition was inevitable because additional standards for infrastructure, operation, and service could not be provided in a timely manner. He noted that continued delays in Phase 2 development further necessitated the move to a new service provider.
What the Numbers Show
The operational disruption is significant enough to warrant a complete user exodus from the proprietary wallet. The recommendation for all users to migrate to external, unaffiliated platforms indicates a total loss of custody control for the company during this interim period. This shift exposes users to self-custody risks while highlighting the severity of the internal technical failures described by management.
Next Steps
The company has begun evaluating candidates for the new technology and service provider. Selection criteria include cybersecurity, infrastructure reliability, system availability, incident response procedures, technical support, operational transparency, and defined service-level standards. Asia Broadband plans to provide further details on the new infrastructure, user migration process, and future availability as the transition progresses. Users are advised to rely only on official Asia Broadband and GoldAxis communication channels for updates.
How might the mandatory migration to self-custody wallets impact user retention rates and trading volume for Asia Broadband in the short term?
What specific financial liabilities or legal risks does Asia Broadband face regarding the operational failures and delays in Phase 2 development?
Which potential technology providers are likely candidates for the new service contract, and how will their selection criteria influence future platform stability?

























