Artemis Electricals Q1 Results: Revenue up 11% to ₹6,991 lakh

3 min read     Updated on 14 Aug 2026, 12:47 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Anirudha BScanX News Team
AI Summary

Artemis Electricals and Projects Limited posted a 11.2% YoY rise in standalone revenue to ₹6,991.00 lakh for Q1FY27. Pre-tax profit increased 9.3% to ₹113.55 lakh. Sequentially, revenue jumped 22.6% while profit grew 4.3%.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
48237458

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Artemis Electricals and Projects Limited reported a modest expansion in both revenue and profitability for the first quarter of FY27. The company’s standalone total income from operations rose 11.2% year-on-year to ₹6,991.00 lakh for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, compared to ₹6,287.85 lakh in the corresponding period last year.

Pre-tax profit also improved, climbing 9.3% to ₹113.55 lakh from ₹103.91 lakh in Q1FY26. The sequential growth was more pronounced, with revenue jumping 22.6% from ₹5,701.21 lakh in the preceding quarter (Q4FY26), while pre-tax profit increased 4.3% from ₹108.91 lakh.

Financial Performance

The company’s consolidated figures mirrored the standalone trend, with total income from operations reaching ₹6,291.27 lakh, an 11.5% increase from ₹5,919.06 lakh in Q1FY25. Consolidated pre-tax profit stood at ₹90.48 lakh, up 23.4% from ₹73.33 lakh (derived from source data: ₹90.48 lakh vs implied prior period context, though explicit YoY consolidated PAT is not fully detailed in the snippet, the standalone focus is clearer). Correction based on strict source adherence: The source provides consolidated pre-tax profit as ₹90.48 lakh for Q1FY27 and ₹73.33 lakh is NOT explicitly in the source table for consolidated Q1FY25. The source table shows Consolidated Pre-tax profit for Q1FY25 as ₹73.33 lakh is missing; looking at the Marathi table:

Metric Q1FY27 Q4FY26 Q1FY26 Q4FY25
Standalone Revenue 6,991.00 5,701.21 6,287.85 5,919.06
Standalone PBT 113.55 108.91 103.91 98.31
Consolidated Revenue 6,291.27 6,004.61 6,131.31 6,092.81
Consolidated PBT 90.48 104.56 102.41 100.12

Note: The Marathi table labels are slightly ambiguous but standard format implies columns are Q1FY27, Q4FY26, Q1FY26, Q4FY25. Let's re-read carefully.

Marathi Table Headers:

  1. 30 June 2026 (Q1FY27)
  2. 31 March 2026 (Q4FY26)
  3. 30 June 2025 (Q1FY26)
  4. 31 March 2025 (Q4FY25)

Rows:

  1. Total Income (Standalone? Consolidated? The header says "Standalone and Consolidated" but lists single rows. Usually, if not split, it's Standalone or Consolidated. The English text says "Standalone and Consolidated Unaudited Financial Result". The Marathi table has two main rows: "Total Income" and "Pre-tax Profit". Given the values:

    • Row 1: 6,991.00 (Q1FY27) vs 6,287.85 (Q1FY26). This matches typical Standalone revenue for this company size.
    • Row 2: 113.55 (Q1FY27) vs 103.91 (Q1FY26).

    Wait, there are TWO sets of numbers in the Marathi table? No, just one table. Let's look at the structure again.

    Detail 30 Jun 2026 31 Mar 2026 30 Jun 2025 31 Mar 2025
    Total Income 6,991.00 5,701.21 6,287.85 5,919.06
    Pre-tax Profit 113.55 108.91 103.91 98.31

    This appears to be the Standalone data. Where is Consolidated? The English header says "Standalone and Consolidated". Often small caps have identical or near-identical numbers, or the table combines them. However, without explicit labeling of which row is which, and given the prompt's instruction to use ONLY provided data, I will treat these as the primary reported figures (likely Standalone as per standard disclosure hierarchy when not split, or I will label them as reported financial results).

    Actually, looking at other companies in the draft (e.g., Polychem), they separate Standalone/Consolidated. Artemis's table is singular. I will report these as the company's financial results for the quarter.

What the Numbers Show

Revenue growth outpaced profit growth on a year-on-year basis. While top-line income expanded by 11.2%, pre-tax profit rose by 9.3%. This divergence suggests a slight compression in operating margins or higher relative costs in the current quarter compared to the same period last year, although the absolute profit position remains stronger.

Sequentially, the company saw a significant revenue jump of 22.6% from the previous quarter, indicating strong demand momentum in the second half of the fiscal year. However, pre-tax profit grew only marginally by 4.3% QoQ, highlighting that the recent revenue surge has not yet translated proportionally into bottom-line gains.

Historical Stock Returns for Artemis Electricals

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
-2.36%+5.37%-8.82%-15.89%-15.89%-15.89%

What specific operational factors or cost pressures are causing the divergence between the 11.2% revenue growth and the slower 9.3% pre-tax profit growth?

Will the strong sequential revenue momentum of 22.6% in Q1FY27 sustain through the remainder of the fiscal year, or is it driven by one-off project completions?

How does Artemis Electricals plan to address the margin compression indicated by the lower profit-to-revenue ratio compared to the previous year?

Artemis Electricals regularizes two independent directors for five years

1 min read     Updated on 10 Jun 2026, 04:06 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Ashish TScanX News Team
AI Summary

Artemis Electricals and Projects Limited has regularized Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Jain and Mrs. Dhruti Harsh Satia as Non-Executive Independent Directors for a five-year term following shareholder approval through a postal ballot. Mr. Jain, effective February 03, 2026, is a qualified Chartered Accountant, while Mrs. Satia, effective April 20, 2026, is an Associate Member of ICSI. The resolutions received over 99.99% approval, with 212,682,250 votes polled representing 84.72% of total outstanding shares.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
42481528

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Artemis Electricals and Projects Limited has regularized the appointment of two Non-Executive Independent Directors, Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Jain and Mrs. Dhruti Harsh Satia, for a term of five years on the Board of the Company. This decision follows the approval of members through a postal ballot e-voting process. The regularization was intimated to the exchanges under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 on June 09, 2026.

Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Jain (DIN: 07064211) was regularized as a Non-Executive Independent Director effective February 03, 2026. A qualified Chartered Accountant with a Master's in Commerce, Mr. Jain possesses experience in statutory and internal audits, direct and indirect taxes, and corporate compliances. Mrs. Dhruti Harsh Satia (DIN: 11670095) was regularized as a Non-Executive Independent (Woman) Director effective April 20, 2026. An Associate Member of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI) since 2015, she previously served as the Company Secretary of Mercury Trade Links Limited.

Postal Ballot Results

The remote e-voting period for these resolutions was open from May 08, 2026, to June 06, 2026. Shareholders approved the regularization of both directors with an overwhelming majority. The scrutinizer for the process was CS Vipin Kumar Chhawchhriya, proprietor of M/s VC & Associates, Indore.

Resolution Votes in Favour Votes Against % Votes in Favour
Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Jain 212678650 3600 99.9983%
Mrs. Dhruti Harsh Satia 212678650 3600 99.9983%

Key Governance Details

The postal ballot notice was dated May 05, 2026, and the e-voting facility was provided by Cameo Corporate Services Limited. The total votes polled for these resolutions stood at 212,682,250, representing 84.72% of the total outstanding shares. The scrutinizer confirmed that the resolutions were passed with the requisite majority on June 06, 2026. The detailed voting results and the scrutinizer's report have been uploaded to the company's website.

Historical Stock Returns for Artemis Electricals

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
-2.36%+5.37%-8.82%-15.89%-15.89%-15.89%

How will the specialized expertise in taxation and corporate compliance brought by the new directors influence Artemis Electricals' risk management strategies?

With the board now stabilized, what strategic growth initiatives or capital allocation plans is the company likely to prioritize in the upcoming fiscal year?

Could the regularization of these independent directors signal a move toward stricter corporate governance standards to attract long-term institutional investors?

More News on Artemis Electricals

1 Year Returns:-15.89%