Apple widens trade secrets fight with OpenAI
Apple Inc. has escalated its legal battle with OpenAI by sending preservation notices to approximately 40 former employees now at the AI company, following a lawsuit alleging a coordinated campaign to steal hardware trade secrets. The complaint accuses OpenAI leadership of directing efforts to extract confidential information from Apple staff, including specific allegations against Chief Hardware Officer Tang Tan regarding recruitment tactics and security bypasses. This conflict intensifies as OpenAI pursues hardware ambitions, including a potential 2027 smart speaker launch, and navigates an IPO process, complicating its previous software partnership with Apple.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Apple Inc. is expanding its legal offensive against OpenAI, sending preservation notices to roughly 40 former Apple employees now working at the artificial intelligence company as the high-stakes trade-secrets lawsuit proceeds. The letters instruct recipients to preserve any documents, communications, or other materials that could be relevant to Apple’s claims and to meet with the company’s attorneys. This move is designed to safeguard potential evidence as litigation proceeds, with OpenAI reportedly employing as many as 400 former Apple workers.
The notices come one week after Apple sued OpenAI in U.S. District Court in San Jose, California. The lawsuit alleges the ChatGPT maker orchestrated a campaign to recruit Apple employees and obtain confidential information related to unreleased hardware, proprietary engineering processes, and product development. Apple claims the alleged misappropriation was directed by senior OpenAI leadership rather than being limited to isolated employee actions.
The legal battle marks a sharp escalation in tensions between two companies whose relationship has become increasingly complex. While Apple has integrated OpenAI’s ChatGPT into Apple Intelligence features across its ecosystem, OpenAI has simultaneously emerged as a potential hardware competitor. This rivalry intensified following OpenAI's acquisition of IO Products, a startup led by former Apple designer Jony Ive, for $6.4 billion.
The lawsuit names specific individuals, including OpenAI Chief Hardware Officer Tang Tan and Chang Liu, a former Apple employee who joined OpenAI in 2026. Apple’s court papers allege Tan steered recruiting conversations toward extracting confidential details from Apple employees and encouraged departing staff to sidestep internal security steps. The complaint further claims OpenAI asked outside hardware partners to use a metal-finishing method Apple says it created, while suggesting Apple had authorized that work.
Industry Reaction and Future Outlook
The lawsuit has drawn sharp reactions from tech industry observers. Futurum Group CEO Daniel Newman suggested OpenAI’s relationships with major technology companies are deteriorating, noting the conflict follows reports that Microsoft Corp. is replacing some OpenAI software with its in-house MAI models. Elon Musk also reacted to the allegations, replying "Sounds pretty bad" to a post highlighting the claims.
The dispute became public shortly after OpenAI confidentially filed paperwork with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for a proposed initial public offering. This filing potentially exposes the company to greater scrutiny from investors over intellectual property risks. As OpenAI accelerates its consumer hardware ambitions, reports indicate the company is developing a new line of AI-native devices, with an AI-powered smart speaker expected to be its first major hardware product and a potential launch targeted for 2027.
How will this lawsuit impact the existing partnership between Apple and OpenAI regarding the integration of ChatGPT into Apple Intelligence?
Could the legal scrutiny of OpenAI's recruitment practices delay the timeline for its reported IPO?
Will the alleged misappropriation of trade secrets force OpenAI to redesign its upcoming AI-native hardware products to avoid infringement?

































