Apollo Finvest re-appoints Akash Saxena as Independent Director

1 min read     Updated on 23 Jun 2026, 05:55 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Anirudha BScanX News Team
AI Summary

Apollo Finvest (India) Ltd announced the results of its postal ballot conducted to re-appoint Mr. Akash Saxena as an Independent Director. The resolution received 99.99% approval, with 2,638,555 votes in favour out of 2,638,582 votes polled. The e-voting process was managed by MUFG Intime India Private Limited and scrutinized by M/s. SGGS & Associates.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
43762773

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Apollo Finvest (India) Ltd has secured shareholder approval to re-appoint Mr. Akash Saxena as an Independent Director for a second term of five consecutive years. The resolution, passed via a postal ballot process, received 99.99% of votes in favour, solidifying the company's leadership structure. The outcome underscores strong shareholder confidence in the incumbent director, whose re-appointment was critical for maintaining governance continuity.

The postal ballot, conducted through remote e-voting, commenced on May 23, 2026, and concluded on June 21, 2026. A total of 2,638,582 votes were polled, representing 70.69% of the company's outstanding shares. The special resolution required a requisite majority, which was comfortably achieved with minimal opposition. Only 27 votes were cast against the resolution, while no votes were abstained or declared invalid.

Voting Breakdown

The voting participation was primarily driven by the Promoter and Promoter Group, which cast 2,638,263 votes in favour, constituting 99.98% of the total votes polled. Public Non-Institutional shareholders also participated, with 292 votes in favour and 27 against. Public Institutions did not participate in the voting process. The detailed voting pattern is summarized below:

Category Votes in Favour Votes Against % of Votes in Favour
Promoter and Promoter Group 2,638,263 0 100.00%
Public Non-Institutions 292 27 91.54%
Public Institutions 0 0 0.00%
Total 2,638,555 27 99.99%

Procedural Compliance

M/s. SGGS & Associates, Company Secretaries, served as the Scrutinizer for the postal ballot, ensuring the process adhered to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, and the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The e-voting facility was managed by MUFG Intime India Private Limited, formerly known as Link Intime India Pvt. Ltd. The record date for determining eligibility was May 15, 2026, with the notice dispatched on May 21, 2026.

The Scrutinizer's Report confirmed that the votes were unblocked in the presence of independent witnesses, Ms. Priyanka Arora and Ms. Aditi Agrawal, ensuring transparency. The results of the postal ballot will be displayed at the company's registered office, its website, and on the BSE Limited platform. The re-appointment of Mr. Akash Saxena is now effective for the specified five-year term.

Historical Stock Returns for Apollo Finvest

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
-0.57%-0.94%+3.22%-14.02%-28.95%-46.56%

What strategic initiatives will Mr. Saxena prioritize during his second term to drive company growth?

How will the company address the lack of participation from Public Institutions in future corporate actions?

What impact will this governance continuity have on Apollo Finvest's long-term investor confidence?

Apollo Finvest faces arbitration claim of INR 6.02 Cr

1 min read     Updated on 19 Jun 2026, 02:01 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Shriram SScanX News Team
AI Summary

Psi Phi Global Solutions Private Limited has initiated arbitration proceedings against Apollo Finvest (India) Ltd before the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Bombay, claiming INR 6.02 Cr. The dispute arises from a Master Service Agreement dated December 1, 2022. Apollo Finvest stated the claims are without merit and expects no material adverse financial impact.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
43403468

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Psi Phi Global Solutions Private Limited has initiated arbitration proceedings against Apollo Finvest (India) Ltd before the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Bombay, claiming INR 6,02,81,512. The dispute arises from a Master Service Agreement dated December 1, 2022, entered into by the company and the claimant for the provision of certain services. The company stated that the allegations and claims made by the claimant are without merit and it intends to vigorously defend its position.

The arbitration proceedings are pending in Mumbai, India. Apollo Finvest has engaged legal counsel to file its response contesting the claim raised by Psi Phi Global Solutions Private Limited. The company's management, based on its current assessment and legal advice, believes the proceedings are not expected to have any material adverse financial impact on the company.

Details of the dispute

The following table outlines the particulars of the litigation and the claims involved:

Particulars Description
Name of opposing party M/s. Psi Phi Global Solutions Private Limited
Court/tribunal Arbitration proceedings under the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Place of Arbitration – Mumbai, India)
Brief details of dispute The arbitration arises from a Master Service Agreement dated December 1, 2022, including a subsequent addendum. The claimant has asserted claims aggregating to INR 6,02,81,512 against the company.
Expected financial implications The company believes the proceedings are not expected to have any material adverse financial impact based on current facts and legal advice.
Quantum of claims INR 6,02,81,512

Apollo Finvest confirmed it is taking requisite steps to safeguard its interests and pursue all remedies available under law. The disclosure was made to BSE Limited on June 19, 2026, under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.

Historical Stock Returns for Apollo Finvest

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
-0.57%-0.94%+3.22%-14.02%-28.95%-46.56%

What is the expected timeline for the arbitration proceedings to reach a resolution?

How might the legal costs associated with defending this claim impact Apollo Finvest's operational expenses in the coming quarters?

Could this dispute lead to a re-evaluation of Apollo Finvest's vendor management and contract oversight processes?

More News on Apollo Finvest

1 Year Returns:-28.95%