AP ACB challenges Cemindia Projects' discharge order in bribery case
Cemindia Projects Limited disclosed that the AP State ACB has filed Criminal Revision Cases in the High Court challenging the April 13, 2026 discharge order in a bribery probe. The case alleges offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. No financial implications or claims are currently quantified.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Cemindia Projects Limited disclosed on August 8, 2026, that the State Anti-Corruption Bureau, Central Investigation Unit (CIU), Andhra Pradesh has challenged its recent legal discharge in a bribery investigation. The opposition party filed Criminal Revision Cases (CRLRCs) along with interim applications for condonation of delay before the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. This development reverses the momentum gained by the company following the discharge order issued by the Court of Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Vijayawada, on April 13, 2026.
The procedural update was made available to the company on August 7, 2026, at 17:52 hours IST and subsequently communicated to stock exchanges under Regulation 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The filing also references SEBI Master Circular No. HO/49/14/14(7)2025-CFD-POD2/I/3762/2026 dated January 30, 2026. The company stated it will issue further updates on the outcome of the CRLRCs in due course.
Case Background
The underlying dispute stems from a criminal case registered against a former employee and a former representative of the company, both of whom are no longer associated with the organization. The prosecution subsequently filed a charge-sheet against these individuals and the company, alleging offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 read with the Indian Penal Code 1860. The specific allegation involved an attempt to bribe public servants.
Prior to the recent revision filing, the former employee and the company had filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking discharge from the case. The Special Judge granted this petition via an order dated April 13, 2026. The current CRLRCs filed by the State ACB directly challenge this discharge order, keeping the legal proceedings active at the appellate level.
| Particulars | Details |
|---|---|
| Opposite Party | The State ACB, CIU, A.P., Vijayawada |
| Forum | Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi |
| Previous Order Date | April 13, 2026 (Discharge Granted) |
| Current Action | Filing of Criminal Revision Cases (CRLRCs) |
| Alleged Offences | Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Indian Penal Code 1860 |
| Financial Implications | Not Applicable |
| Quantum of Claims | Not Applicable |
Legal Implications
The disclosure explicitly states that there are no expected financial implications or quantum of claims associated with these proceedings at this stage. Furthermore, the litigation does not currently involve any Key Managerial Personnel, promoters, or ultimate persons in control of the company. The proceedings remain focused on the corporate entity and the named former individuals.
The company's compliance team, led by Company Secretary Rahul Neogi, confirmed that all requisite details were enclosed as Annexure A in the regulatory filing. The matter remains sub-judice, with the next significant milestone being the hearing of the interim applications and the main revision cases before the High Court.
Historical Stock Returns for Cemindia Projects
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3.03% | -11.08% | -20.59% | +90.30% | +63.73% | +1,362.59% |
How might the reversal of the discharge order impact Cemindia's ability to secure new government contracts in Andhra Pradesh?
What is the typical timeline for resolving Criminal Revision Cases (CRLRCs) in the Andhra Pradesh High Court, and how long might this legal uncertainty persist?
Could this prolonged litigation affect Cemindia's credit ratings or borrowing costs despite the stated lack of immediate financial implications?


































