Cemindia Projects initiates arbitration against IWAI for ₹130 crore
Cemindia Projects Limited filed for arbitration against the Inland Waterways Authority of India on June 18, 2026, seeking ₹130 crore for unpaid bills and delay costs on the Haldia IWT Terminal project. A three-member tribunal, led by Retd. Justice Devi Prasad Singh, was constituted on July 30, 2026, to hear the case involving claims for additional works, interest, and retention money release.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Cemindia Projects has initiated arbitration proceedings against the Inland Waterways Authority of India (IWAI) to recover approximately ₹130 crore in outstanding claims. The legal action stems from disputes over the Engineering, Procurement and Construction of a multi-modal Inland Water Transport (IWT) Terminal at Haldia, West Bengal, where the company alleges non-payment of certified bills and costs associated with project delays.
The arbitration notice was issued on June 18, 2026, and the Arbitration Tribunal was formally constituted on July 30, 2026. This disclosure was made under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, read with SEBI Master Circular No. HO/49/14/14(7)2025-CFD-POD2/I/3762/2026 dated January 30, 2026.
The tribunal comprises three members appointed to resolve the dispute:
| Role | Name | Background |
|---|---|---|
| Presiding Arbitrator | Retd. Justice Devi Prasad Singh | Former Judge, Allahabad High Court at Lucknow |
| Co-Arbitrator | Shri Sanjay Kumar | Former Director (Operations), Kamarajar Port Ltd. |
| Co-Arbitrator | Shri S. Soundararajan | Former Chief Engineer, Chennai Port |
The core of the dispute involves multiple financial components arising from the execution of the Jal Marg Vikas Project. Cemindia Projects is seeking recovery for certified and un-certified bills, claims on additional works executed beyond the original scope, prolongation costs incurred due to delays, interest on delayed payments, and the release of retention money.
What the Numbers Show
The claimed amount of ₹130 crore excludes further interest, taxes, and legal costs. The filing notes that this figure is subject to revised quantification or updation during the arbitration proceedings. For infrastructure contractors like Cemindia Projects, such disputes often signal cash flow pressures, as retention money and delayed bill payments tie up working capital. The outcome will depend on the tribunal’s assessment of contract clauses regarding delay liabilities and additional work valuations.
Historical Stock Returns for Cemindia Projects
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.46% | -2.86% | -8.23% | +96.91% | +71.68% | +1,447.18% |
How might the ₹130 crore claim impact Cemindia Projects' short-term liquidity and working capital requirements during the arbitration process?
What precedent could this tribunal's ruling set for other infrastructure contractors facing similar disputes with the Inland Waterways Authority of India?
Could prolonged legal proceedings delay the operational commissioning of the Haldia multi-modal terminal, affecting India's broader Jal Marg Vikas Project timelines?


































