Cemindia Projects initiates arbitration against IWAI for ₹130 crore

1 min read     Updated on 03 Aug 2026, 10:26 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Riya DScanX News Team
AI Summary

Cemindia Projects Limited filed for arbitration against the Inland Waterways Authority of India on June 18, 2026, seeking ₹130 crore for unpaid bills and delay costs on the Haldia IWT Terminal project. A three-member tribunal, led by Retd. Justice Devi Prasad Singh, was constituted on July 30, 2026, to hear the case involving claims for additional works, interest, and retention money release.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
47278557

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Cemindia Projects has initiated arbitration proceedings against the Inland Waterways Authority of India (IWAI) to recover approximately ₹130 crore in outstanding claims. The legal action stems from disputes over the Engineering, Procurement and Construction of a multi-modal Inland Water Transport (IWT) Terminal at Haldia, West Bengal, where the company alleges non-payment of certified bills and costs associated with project delays.

The arbitration notice was issued on June 18, 2026, and the Arbitration Tribunal was formally constituted on July 30, 2026. This disclosure was made under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, read with SEBI Master Circular No. HO/49/14/14(7)2025-CFD-POD2/I/3762/2026 dated January 30, 2026.

The tribunal comprises three members appointed to resolve the dispute:

Role Name Background
Presiding Arbitrator Retd. Justice Devi Prasad Singh Former Judge, Allahabad High Court at Lucknow
Co-Arbitrator Shri Sanjay Kumar Former Director (Operations), Kamarajar Port Ltd.
Co-Arbitrator Shri S. Soundararajan Former Chief Engineer, Chennai Port

The core of the dispute involves multiple financial components arising from the execution of the Jal Marg Vikas Project. Cemindia Projects is seeking recovery for certified and un-certified bills, claims on additional works executed beyond the original scope, prolongation costs incurred due to delays, interest on delayed payments, and the release of retention money.

What the Numbers Show

The claimed amount of ₹130 crore excludes further interest, taxes, and legal costs. The filing notes that this figure is subject to revised quantification or updation during the arbitration proceedings. For infrastructure contractors like Cemindia Projects, such disputes often signal cash flow pressures, as retention money and delayed bill payments tie up working capital. The outcome will depend on the tribunal’s assessment of contract clauses regarding delay liabilities and additional work valuations.

Historical Stock Returns for Cemindia Projects

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
-2.46%-2.86%-8.23%+96.91%+71.68%+1,447.18%

How might the ₹130 crore claim impact Cemindia Projects' short-term liquidity and working capital requirements during the arbitration process?

What precedent could this tribunal's ruling set for other infrastructure contractors facing similar disputes with the Inland Waterways Authority of India?

Could prolonged legal proceedings delay the operational commissioning of the Haldia multi-modal terminal, affecting India's broader Jal Marg Vikas Project timelines?

Cemindia Projects JV awarded ₹212.54 Cr by tribunal in DMRCL dispute

1 min read     Updated on 02 Aug 2026, 04:03 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Shriram SScanX News Team
AI Summary

Cemindia Projects Limited disclosed that an Arbitral Tribunal awarded its joint venture Rs 212.54 Crore plus GST and costs in a dispute with Delhi Metro Rail Corporation. The tribunal rejected DMRCL’s counter-claim of Rs 22.19 Crore. The award relates to a contract signed in 2013 for prolongation and uncertified work claims.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
47212367

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

An Arbitral Tribunal (AT) has awarded the ITD ITD Cem Joint Venture (the JV) an amount of Rs 212.54 Crore plus GST and costs against Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited (DMRCL). The award, published on August 01, 2026, resolves long-standing contractual claims concerning prolongation of work, uncertified work, and recoveries. Cemindia Projects Limited , which holds a 49% stake in the JV, disclosed the outcome on August 02, 2026, noting that the financial impact will be determined upon actual receipt of the amount. The tribunal also entirely rejected DMRCL’s counter-claim of Rs 22.19 Crore plus interest, GST, and cost.

The disclosure was made under Regulation 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, as amended read with SEBI Master Circular No. HO/49/14/14(7)2025-CFD-POD2/I/3762/2026 dated January 30, 2026. The original contract between the JV and DMRCL was entered into on January 14, 2013. Disputes arising from this contract were referred to arbitration before a three-member Arbitral Tribunal.

Award Details

The Arbitral Tribunal’s decision addresses both the primary claim by the JV and the counter-claim filed by DMRCL. The JV had claimed Rs 322.22 Crore plus interest, GST, and cost. The tribunal awarded a significant portion of this claim while dismissing the opposing party’s demands.

Particulars Details
Awarded Amount Rs 212.54 Crore + GST
Costs Awarded Rs 0.87 Crore + post-award Interest
JV Original Claim Rs 322.22 Crore + Interest + GST + Cost
DMRCL Counter-Claim Rs 22.19 Crore + Interest + GST + Cost
Counter-Claim Status Entirely rejected

What the Numbers Show

The award represents approximately 66% of the JV’s original monetary claim of Rs 322.22 Crore, excluding interest and GST components which are calculated separately. The complete rejection of DMRCL’s counter-claim of Rs 22.19 Crore removes a potential liability that could have offset the awarded sum. Given Cemindia Projects Limited’s 49% equity participation in the joint venture, the company is entitled to nearly half of the net proceeds received from this award, subject to any applicable taxes and internal JV agreements. The final financial impact on the company’s books remains contingent on the actual receipt of funds from DMRCL.

Historical Stock Returns for Cemindia Projects

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
-2.46%-2.86%-8.23%+96.91%+71.68%+1,447.18%

How might the actual receipt timeline of the Rs 212.54 Crore award impact Cemindia Projects Limited's near-term cash flow and liquidity ratios?

What is the likelihood of DMRCL appealing this arbitral decision in higher courts, and how would such an appeal affect the finalization of these funds?

Could this favorable ruling encourage Cemindia Projects Limited or its JV partners to pursue similar unresolved contractual claims with other public sector undertakings?

More News on Cemindia Projects

1 Year Returns:+71.68%