Ansal Properties COC Approves CIRP Expenses as Unauthorized Claims Warning Continues
Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Limited reported successful voting outcomes from its 50th Committee of Creditors meeting for the Fernhill Project, approving CIRP expenses and authorised representative fees. Simultaneously, the company continues issuing public warnings against unauthorized third parties attempting fraudulent activities in its name, advising investors to verify all dealings through official channels while CIRP proceedings remain ongoing across multiple projects.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Limited has issued stern warnings to investors and the general public against unauthorized third parties attempting to conduct business on behalf of the company and its subsidiaries, while simultaneously reporting outcomes from its latest Committee of Creditors meeting.
50th COC Meeting Approves Key Resolutions
The company has announced the voting results of the 50th Meeting of Committee of Creditors for the Fernhill Project situated at Gurugram, Haryana, held on March 23, 2026, with voting concluded on March 27, 2026.
| Item No.: | Agenda Item | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ratifying and approving expenses incurred during CIRP Period till March 15, 2026 | Approved |
| 2 | Ratifying fee payable to Ms. Aakriti Sood, Authorised Representative of financial creditors in homebuyers class | Approved |
Company Issues Multiple Public Warnings
The real estate company has published several public notices cautioning all investors, financial creditors, banks, and buyers not to make any payments to third parties claiming authority on behalf of Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Limited, Ansal Hi-Tech Townships Limited, Ansal Landmark Townships Limited, or any of their subsidiaries and group companies.
According to the company's notices dated March 27, 2026, certain unauthorized persons and entities have been circulating development agreements, board resolutions, and purported authorization documents while claiming association with these companies.
Fraudulent Activities Identified
| Type of Fraudulent Activity: | Details |
|---|---|
| Document Circulation | Development agreements and board resolutions |
| False Claims | Promises of allotment and development rights |
| Investment Schemes | Unauthorized investment opportunities |
| Authorization Documents | Purported authority documents |
The company has specifically advised the public not to rely upon or act on any such representations, including promises of allotment, development rights, or investment opportunities. Any documents or representations made by third parties should be treated as unauthorized and invalid unless officially confirmed by the company.
Current CIRP Structure
Ansal Properties has clarified that matters concerning its Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process are managed across different projects by separate Resolution Professionals. The Fernhill Project at District Gurgaon, Haryana, is managed by Shri Jalesh Kumar Grover, while Lucknow and Rajasthan projects are managed by Shri Navneet Kumar Gupta.
The newly constituted Board of Directors remains duty-bound to preserve, protect, and safeguard the company's assets and interests until final decisions in pending cases.
Advisory to Public
Ansal Properties has advised the public to exercise due caution and verify all dealings directly through official channels. The company has requested immediate reporting of any suspicious activities at contactansalapi@gmail.com . The company's registered office is located at 115, Ansal Bhawan, 16, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110001.
Historical Stock Returns for Ansal Properties & Infrastructure
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.33% | -2.90% | -24.75% | -35.13% | -17.98% | -68.97% |
How might these fraudulent activities impact investor confidence in Ansal Properties' ongoing resolution process and future fundraising efforts?
What legal measures could Ansal Properties pursue against the unauthorized third parties, and how effective might these be in preventing further fraud?
Will the company need to implement additional verification systems or security protocols that could delay the CIRP timeline for the Fernhill and other projects?


































