Analyst Says Oracle's $630B AI Backlog Is Mispriced By Market
DA Davidson's Gil Luria argues that Oracle Corp.'s $630 billion AI backlog is undervalued by the market. Despite initial hype followed by skepticism over OpenAI's ability to pay, Luria believes the startup's new funding and flexible contracts ensure revenue realization, implying potential upside for Oracle shares.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Wall Street is currently assigning no value to Oracle Corp.'s $630 billion backlog of artificial intelligence compute revenue, a misjudgment that could lead to significant repricing, according to Gil Luria, managing director and head of Technology Research at DA Davidson. Luria argues that while investors initially overhyped Oracle's AI prospects following its September 2025 partnership with OpenAI, they have now swung too far in the opposite direction by treating the massive contracted revenue stream as if it carries negative value.
The shift in sentiment began when Oracle announced its collaboration with OpenAI, causing the company's backlog to jump from roughly $150 billion to $450 billion in a single day. At the time, Luria noted that "everybody was on the bandwagon," crowning Oracle as the definitive AI winner. However, enthusiasm quickly evaporated as investors realized that much of this backlog was tied to OpenAI, a startup that then had limited revenue and capital. This raised concerns about whether those long-term infrastructure commitments would ever translate into actual cash flow.
Changing Investment Thesis
Luria asserts that the investment thesis has fundamentally changed since those early doubts emerged. Once OpenAI secured fresh funding and clarified that many of its infrastructure agreements were flexible rather than fixed obligations, the risk profile shifted dramatically. Luria stated, "They are going to pay their Oracle bills," arguing that OpenAI has narrowed its focus to compute and now possesses the resources to honor the commitments that matter most. This development should have prompted investors to reassess the value of Oracle's future revenue streams, but instead, skepticism has deepened.
The $630 Billion Disconnect
Despite these developments, Luria believes Wall Street continues to miss the bigger picture. He highlighted that Oracle's entire backlog, now valued at $630 billion worth of compute revenue, is being valued by the market at zero. Luria even suggested that investors could argue the backlog is being valued at less than nothing, with the market treating it "almost...negative to some extent." This disconnect implies that if Oracle's AI customers continue converting long-term compute commitments into revenue, the market may eventually need to reprice a backlog that currently receives virtually no credit despite representing hundreds of billions of dollars in future business.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between Oracle's reported backlog and its market valuation highlights a significant gap in investor perception. While the backlog grew from $150 billion to $450 billion overnight in September 2025 and has since expanded to $630 billion, the market's failure to assign any positive value to these contracts suggests a deep-seated fear regarding execution risk or customer solvency. However, Luria's analysis points to the flexibility of these agreements and OpenAI's improved financial position as key factors that mitigate these risks, suggesting the current valuation may be overly pessimistic.
How might Oracle's stock valuation adjust if OpenAI successfully converts its flexible infrastructure commitments into consistent, high-margin recurring revenue?
What specific financial metrics or milestones would need to be met for Wall Street to shift from treating Oracle's AI backlog as a risk to valuing it as a core asset?
Could the skepticism surrounding Oracle's OpenAI dependency encourage other major AI startups to diversify their cloud infrastructure providers, potentially impacting Oracle's market share?

































