Aksh Optifibre AGM resolutions pass with 99.97% support
- All four ordinary resolutions passed with over 99.97% support from valid votes polled
- Promoter group voted 100% in favour across all agenda items, covering 66.44% of their holding via e-voting
- Public non-institutional shareholders participated minimally, voting only 5.43% of their total holding
- Meeting held under IRP supervision following NCLAT order restricting IRP's operational steps

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Aksh Optifibre Limited shareholders approved all four ordinary resolutions at the 39th Annual General Meeting, with votes in favour ranging from 99.97% to 99.99% of valid votes polled.
The meeting, concluded at 2:12 pm on September 28, 2026, was attended by 123 members via video conferencing. Chairman Dr. Kailash Shantilal Choudhari welcomed attendees, noting that all directors and key managerial personnel participated remotely from the corporate office amidst ongoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process proceedings.
Insolvency status and governance
The company disclosed that it is undergoing CIRP under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, following a June 19, 2026 order by the National Company Law Tribunal, Jaipur Bench. Mr. Praveen Kumar Singhal was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). However, an appeal filed by Dr. Choudhari before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal resulted in a June 30, 2026 order stating that the IRP shall not take further steps, and the company shall operate under IRP supervision with assistance from the promoter and employees.
Voting results breakdown
Members adopted the audited standalone and consolidated financial statements for FY26. The following ordinary resolutions were passed with requisite majority:
| Resolution | Description | Votes in Favour (%) | Votes Against (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adoption of Financials | To receive, consider, and adopt annual audited financial statements for FY26 | 99.99% | 0.003% |
| Director Re-appointment | Appointment of Dr. Kailash Shantilal Choudhari as Director in place of himself | 99.97% | 0.028% |
| Consultant Re-appointment | Re-appointment of Mr. Satyendra Kumar Gupta as Professional Consultant | 99.97% | 0.028% |
| Cost Auditor Ratification | Ratification of Cost Auditor's remuneration for FY27 | 99.98% | 0.020% |
Dr. Choudhari retired by rotation and offered himself for re-appointment, which was approved by shareholders. Mr. Gupta, a Non-Executive Director, was also re-appointed as a professional consultant.
Scrutiny and attendance details
E-voting facilities were provided through KFin Technologies Limited, with remote voting opening on September 25, 2026, and closing on September 27, 2026. M/s Neelam Gupta & Associates served as the scrutinizer to ensure a fair voting process. The consolidated voting results will be reported to stock exchanges and published on company websites.
What the numbers show
The voting data reveals a significant divergence between promoter and public shareholder participation. Promoter group members cast votes representing 314,47,624 shares, accounting for 66.44% of their holding through e-voting and 33.56% through Insta Poll, with 100% support across all resolutions. In contrast, public non-institutional shareholders voted only 5.43% of their total holding. While public opposition existed (ranging from 0.017% to 0.153% against specific items), the overwhelming promoter consensus ensured the passage of all resolutions, highlighting the concentration of voting power in the hands of the promoter group during the insolvency process.
Historical Stock Returns for Aksh Optifibre
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.43% | -9.82% | -5.48% | +60.68% | -7.10% | 0.0% |
How will the NCLAT's order restricting the IRP's authority impact the timeline and feasibility of the corporate insolvency resolution for Aksh Optifibre?
What are the potential regulatory or legal challenges arising from the promoter group's overwhelming voting control during the ongoing CIRP proceedings?
How might the continued operation under IRP supervision with promoter assistance affect creditor confidence and future debt restructuring negotiations?
































