Gold eyes best monthly gain since September 1999 on fiscal fears
- Gold traded above $4,700, targeting best monthly gain since September 1999
- August rally reached roughly 14% driven by US Treasury buyback expansion
- 30-year Treasury yield fell 4 basis points to 4.22% on Monday
- Fiscal concerns replace monetary triggers as primary driver for bullion

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Spot gold traded above $4,700 an ounce early Monday, the highest level since May 13. The precious metal is on track for its best monthly performance since September 1999, driven by US Treasury interventions and growing fiscal concerns.
Market reaction
The SPDR Gold Shares (NYSE: GLD) rose roughly 14% in August. The initial surge saw gold rise 3.6% toward $4,500 after the US Treasury announced it would increase liquidity-support buybacks for 10- to 30-year securities from $2 billion to at least $4 billion per operation. This announcement, made outside the usual quarterly schedule, sent yields and the dollar sharply lower. On Monday, the 30-year Treasury yield fell by 4 basis points to 4.22%.
| Metric | Change |
|---|---|
| Gold (SPDR Gold Shares) | +3.6% toward $4,500 (initial) |
| Gold (Monday trade) | Above $4,700 |
| August Gain | Roughly 14% |
| 30-year Treasury yield | Down 4 bps to 4.22% |
| Bitcoin (BTC) | +5% (near $68,100) |
Metals trader Robert Gottlieb called the announcement "totally unexpected" and "very bullish for gold," according to Reuters. Strategist John Briggs told the Wall Street Journal the timing indicated officials "didn't like what was happening."
Signal over size
The extra $2 billion per operation is small relative to the roughly $31 trillion Treasury market. Traders appear to be pricing the signal rather than the volume: that Scott Bessent's Treasury is willing to lean against disorderly moves in long-term yields. Joseph Purtell, a rates trader at Neuberger Berman, questioned whether the extra amount justified the nine-basis-point move. Instead, he noted the market now sees a "soft line in the sand" for Treasury yields.
Breakdown of real-yield trade
Gold and yields typically move in opposite directions due to opportunity costs. However, this dynamic is shifting. According to Morgan Stanley, gold’s reaction has moved from yields to the causes of higher yields, including wider fiscal deficits, debt expansion, and concerns about fiat debasement. Consequently, higher yields and higher gold coexist when both reflect eroding fiscal confidence.
Options markets may be amplifying this shift. Goldman Sachs sees call option demand for the metal rising sharply, signaling a mechanical price amplifier to both the upside and downside. As prices approach major strikes, dealer hedging flows can force additional buying. Goldman said that dynamic, alongside resilient central-bank demand, could push bullion above its $4,900 year-end forecast.
Historical context
The last time gold moved this fast was in September 1999, when fifteen European central banks signed a pact promising to stop dumping their reserves. Gold rose then because governments agreed to stop selling it. This time the trigger is fiscal, not monetary. The Treasury Department’s plan to at least double buybacks of long-dated government debt pushed yields and the dollar lower, reviving demand for assets that cannot be printed.
The specter of repression
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s decision to expand long-dated debt buybacks has been read as more than routine maintenance. Economist Mohamed El-Erian refrained from calling it yield-curve control but noted "it might be a step in that direction." In contrast, World Gold Council Senior Quantitative Analyst Johan Palmberg called it a "monetary policy’s version of plausible deniability."
If policy gradually suppresses term yields while inflation remains sticky, real rates can compress over time, creating a favorable environment for gold. Furthermore, increased pressure on the dollar creates another tailwind since global buyers can purchase gold more cheaply in local-currency terms.
Debt spiral and institutional allocation
Bridgewater founder Ray Dalio sees the issue as a fiscal inflection point. He wrote on LinkedIn that the government’s financial condition is at an inflection point, pointing to a roughly $2 trillion annual shortfall, about $1 trillion in interest costs, and debt-service/refinancing burdens he equates to roughly $11 trillion in scale. He warned a debt crisis could emerge in "three years, give or take two."
Dalio’s portfolio plan involves being underweight sovereign debt and holding 10% to 15% in "non-government produced monies," including gold and some bitcoin. Discussing the path out, he sees three steps: reducing government spending, increasing tax revenue, and lowering interest rates.
Prediction markets and asset views
Prediction markets suggest the bond selloff may not be over. Kalshi traders still put 53% odds on the 10-year finishing 2026 at 4.75% or above, and a 34% chance it ends the year at 5% or higher. Peter Schiff argued the Treasury is accepting higher inflation to slow the rise in long-term rates. He predicted gold and silver will hold gains but stated "Bitcoin is a sell." However, Bitcoin was up more than 5% near $68,100 on Wednesday, outperforming gold on the day.
What the numbers show
The divergence between trader sentiment and prediction market odds highlights uncertainty in the bond market. While the immediate reaction saw yields fall near 9 bps, Kalshi data indicates a majority view (53%) that the 10-year yield will remain elevated at 4.75% or higher by year-end. This suggests the Treasury's intervention may have stabilized short-term volatility without convincing traders that the longer-term yield trajectory has fundamentally shifted downward. Additionally, the coexistence of rising gold prices and elevated yields signals a structural shift where investors are pricing fiscal risk rather than just opportunity cost.
Will the Treasury's expanded buyback program evolve into formal yield-curve control, and how might that impact the Federal Reserve's monetary policy independence?
Given the structural shift where gold and yields rise together, how should institutional investors recalibrate their asset allocation models to account for fiscal risk rather than just opportunity cost?
If prediction markets are correct that 10-year yields remain above 4.75% by year-end, what specific fiscal measures must the US government implement to prevent the debt spiral warned by Ray Dalio?

































