Paramount Cosmetics Shareholders Reject All Special Resolutions in Postal Ballot
Paramount Cosmetics (India) Limited announced that shareholders have rejected all three special resolutions in the postal ballot conducted through remote e-voting. The resolutions included alteration of articles of association, approval for asset sales, and immovable property disposal, all receiving 70.85% support but failing to meet the required 75% majority for special resolutions.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Paramount Cosmetics (India) Limited has announced that shareholders have rejected all three special resolutions proposed in the postal ballot conducted through remote e-voting. The company informed BSE Limited on January 16, 2026, that members have not accorded their approval to any of the resolutions set out in the postal ballot notice dated December 12, 2025.
Scrutinizer's Report and Process
Mr. Brajesh Gupta of Brajesh Gupta & Co., appointed as scrutinizer on December 5, 2025, submitted his comprehensive report on January 15, 2026, confirming that all resolutions were deemed rejected due to insufficient majority. The scrutinizer was appointed pursuant to Section 108 and 110 of the Companies Act, 2013, and Regulation 44 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
The remote e-voting process commenced at 9:00 a.m. on December 15, 2025, and concluded at 5:00 p.m. on January 13, 2026. The voting portal was managed by Central Depository Services Limited (CDSL) with Electronic Voting Sequence Number "251212003".
| Parameter: | Details |
|---|---|
| Record Date: | December 5, 2025 |
| Total Shareholders: | 6,304 |
| Voting Period: | December 15, 2025 - January 13, 2026 |
| Scrutinizer: | Mr. Brajesh Gupta (CS, A33070) |
| Total Outstanding Shares: | 4,855,000 |
| E-voting Platform: | CDSL ( www.evotingindia.com ) |
Voting Results Summary
All three special resolutions failed to achieve the required 75% majority despite receiving 70.85% votes in favor. The voting pattern remained identical across all resolutions, with only public non-institutional shareholders participating in the voting process.
| Voting Category: | Shares Held | Votes Polled | Participation (%) | Votes For | Votes Against |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter Group: | 3,630,740 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Public Institutions: | 1,400 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Public Non-Institutions: | 1,222,860 | 131,396 | 10.74% | 93,096 | 38,300 |
| Total: | 4,855,000 | 131,396 | 2.71% | 93,096 | 38,300 |
Detailed Resolution-wise Results
The scrutinizer's report provided comprehensive voting details for each resolution:
| Resolution Details: | Members For | Members Against | Votes For | Votes Against | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Articles Alteration (MD Exemption): | 209 | 3 | 93,096 | 38,300 | Rejected |
| Asset Sale to Paramount Kum Kum: | 209 | 3 | 93,096 | 38,300 | Rejected |
| Immovable Property Sale Approval: | 209 | 3 | 93,096 | 38,300 | Rejected |
Rejected Resolutions
The three special resolutions that were rejected include:
Resolution 1: Alteration of Articles of Association to insert a clause exempting the Managing Director from retirement by rotation. This resolution aimed to provide continuity in leadership by exempting the managing director from the standard retirement rotation process.
Resolution 2: Approval for sale of fixed assets to Paramount Kum Kum Pvt. Ltd. This proposal involved the disposal of company assets to a related entity, requiring shareholder approval due to potential conflicts of interest.
Resolution 3: Approval under Section 180(1)(A) for sale of immovable property. This resolution sought authorization for the company to sell real estate assets, which requires specific shareholder consent under company law provisions.
Key Observations
A significant aspect of the voting outcome was the complete non-participation of the promoter and promoter group, who hold 3,630,740 shares representing approximately 74.78% of the total shareholding. All three resolutions were identified as matters where the promoter group had interests, yet they abstained from voting entirely.
The overall voter turnout was notably low at 2.71% of total outstanding shares, with only 131,396 votes cast out of 4,855,000 eligible shares. The scrutinizer confirmed that no invalid votes were recorded, and the voting process was conducted in accordance with the Companies Act, 2013, and SEBI regulations. The votes were unblocked from the CDSL website on January 13, 2026, at 17:19 P.M., and all records remain in the scrutinizer's custody until the Chairman approves the minutes.
Historical Stock Returns for Paramount Cosmetics
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.99% | -3.06% | -2.43% | -19.28% | -24.95% | +105.70% |





























