Maple Infrastructure Trust Submits Corporate Governance Report for Q3 FY26

2 min read     Updated on 21 Jan 2026, 06:29 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Shriram SScanX News Team
Overview

Maple Infrastructure Trust filed its Q3 FY26 corporate governance report with BSE on January 21, 2026, showcasing a seven-member board with four independent directors and six specialized committees. The board conducted three meetings during the quarter with full attendance and proper quorum, while key committees including Audit, Risk Management, and InvIT Committee remained active with regular oversight activities.

30545957

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Maple Infrastructure Trust has submitted its corporate governance report for the quarter ended December 31, 2025, to BSE Limited in compliance with Regulation 26K of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Infrastructure Investment Trusts) Regulations, 2014. The report was filed on January 21, 2026, by Vikas Prakash, Company Secretary and Compliance Officer of Maple Infra InvIT Investment Manager Private Limited.

Board Composition and Leadership Structure

The Investment Manager's board comprises seven directors with a balanced composition of independent and non-independent members. The board structure demonstrates compliance with regulatory requirements for infrastructure investment trusts.

Position Name Category Appointment Date
Chairman Louis-Marie St-Maurice Non-Independent Director March 31, 2023
Director Anil Chaudhry Independent Director May 29, 2024
Director Parthasarathy Vankipuram Srinivasa Independent Director December 16, 2024
Director Seema Gupta Independent Director March 31, 2023
Director Shalini Kalsi Kamath Independent Director April 30, 2024
Director Chirdeep Singh Bagga Non-Independent Director December 14, 2024
Director Niraj Kumar Murarka Unitholder Nominee Director December 13, 2024

The board maintains four independent directors out of seven total members, ensuring adequate independent oversight. Louis-Marie St-Maurice serves as Chairman and is confirmed to be unrelated to any managing director or CEO.

Committee Structure and Governance

The trust operates six specialized committees to ensure comprehensive governance oversight. Each committee has appointed regular chairpersons and maintains appropriate composition as per SEBI regulations.

Key Committees:

  • Audit Committee: Chaired by Parthasarathy Vankipuram Srinivasa (Independent Director)
  • Nomination & Remuneration Committee: Chaired by Shalini Kalsi Kamath (Independent Director)
  • Risk Management Committee: Chaired by Louis Marie St-Maurice (Non-Independent Director)
  • Stakeholders Relationship Committee: Chaired by Anil Chaudhry (Independent Director)
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Committee: Chaired by Chirdeep Singh Bagga (Non-Independent Director)
  • InvIT Committee: Chaired by Chirdeep Singh Bagga (Non-Independent Director)

Board and Committee Meeting Activity

During the quarter ended December 31, 2025, the board conducted three meetings with full quorum maintained throughout. The meeting schedule included sessions on October 14, November 12 (two separate meetings), and December 10, 2025.

Meeting Date Directors Present Independent Directors Present Gap Between Meetings (Days)
October 14, 2025 7 4 63
November 12, 2025 7 4 28
November 12, 2025 7 4 0
December 10, 2025 7 4 27

Committee activity during the quarter included meetings of the Audit Committee, Risk Management Committee, and InvIT Committee. The Audit Committee met on November 12, 2025, with three directors present including two independent directors. The Risk Management Committee also convened on November 12, 2025, with three directors present including one independent director.

Regulatory Compliance and Affirmations

The trust confirmed full compliance with SEBI (Infrastructure Investment Trusts) Regulations, 2014, across all governance aspects. All committee compositions align with regulatory requirements, and committee members have been briefed on their powers, roles, and responsibilities. The report for the previous quarter ended September 30, 2025, was presented to the Board of Directors at their November 12, 2025 meeting, while the current quarter report will be placed before the board at the next scheduled meeting.

The corporate governance report is also available on the trust's website at www.maplehighways.com , ensuring transparency and accessibility for stakeholders.

MAIT Rejects Claims Of Mandatory Source Code Sharing, Backs MeitY's Framework

1 min read     Updated on 14 Jan 2026, 05:49 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Suketu GScanX News Team
Overview

MAIT has dismissed reports claiming mandatory source code sharing requirements for smartphone manufacturers, stating such claims are incorrect and misleading. The industry body clarified that MeitY's June 18, 2025 memorandum provides clear guidance without mandating compulsory source code disclosure, superseding earlier drafts and discussions. MAIT supports the amended ITSAR framework, emphasizing it balances national security needs with intellectual property protection concerns raised by global electronics manufacturers in India.

29938780

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Industry body MAIT has categorically rejected reports suggesting that smartphone and electronics manufacturers would be forced to share proprietary source code with Indian authorities, calling such claims "incorrect and misleading". The clarification comes amid heightened scrutiny of India's cybersecurity regulations following international reports about potential mandatory source code disclosure requirements.

MeitY's Clear Guidance Framework

In an official statement, the industry association emphasized that the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has not mandated compulsory source code disclosure. MAIT highlighted that the Office Memorandum issued on June 18, 2025, provides definitive guidance that supersedes all earlier drafts, interpretations, and informal discussions on the cybersecurity testing issue.

Key Framework Details: Specifications
Memorandum Date: June 18, 2025
Regulatory Status: Supersedes earlier drafts
Industry Alignment: Global practices compliant
IP Protection: Intellectual property rights preserved

Industry Association's Position

MAIT clarified that internal documents referenced in recent media reports were intended solely for member-level deliberations and should not be interpreted as advocacy for mandatory source code sharing or regulatory enforcement. The association stressed that these documents do not represent official policy positions or regulatory requirements.

The industry body expressed confidence that MeitY's guidance addresses cybersecurity testing concerns without compromising intellectual property rights, aligning with established global industry practices.

Support for ITSAR Amendments

Backing MeitY's amendments to the Indian Telecommunication Security Assurance Requirements (ITSAR), MAIT stated that the revised framework successfully strikes a balance between national security assurance and protection of proprietary technologies. This balance addresses concerns that have been repeatedly raised by global electronics manufacturers operating in the Indian market.

ITSAR Framework Benefits: Details
Security Assurance: National security requirements met
Technology Protection: Proprietary technologies safeguarded
Industry Concerns: Global manufacturer concerns addressed
Regulatory Clarity: Clear guidelines provided

The association's endorsement of the amended framework reflects industry confidence in the government's approach to cybersecurity regulation while maintaining competitive business environments for international technology companies.

More News on Maple Infrastructure Trust
Explore Other Articles