SAT Dismisses Linde India Appeal, Upholds SEBI Order on Related Party Transactions
The Securities Appellate Tribunal dismissed Linde India's appeal against SEBI's order regarding related party transactions, confirming violations in dealings with Praxair India Private Limited. The tribunal upheld key regulatory directions requiring aggregation of all related party transactions for materiality testing and mandated business valuation of geographical allocation agreements, rejecting the company's arguments for single-contract interpretation and establishing important precedents for listed entity compliance.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Linde India Limited faces a significant regulatory setback as the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has dismissed the company's appeal against a SEBI order regarding related party transactions. The tribunal's comprehensive ruling, delivered on December 5, 2025, upholds key regulatory directions that will impact the company's future transaction approvals.
SAT Order Details
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Order Date | December 5, 2025 |
| Tribunal Decision | Appeal dismissed |
| Interlocutory Applications | All disposed of |
| Costs | No costs awarded |
| Appeal Number | 527 of 2024 |
Key Regulatory Violations Confirmed
The tribunal confirmed SEBI's findings regarding two primary violations by Linde India Limited:
Material Related Party Transaction Violations
The company failed to obtain shareholder approvals for material related party transactions undertaken with Praxair India Private Limited, a related party. The tribunal ruled that for testing materiality thresholds under Regulation 23(1) of LODR Regulations, all transactions with a related party during a financial year must be aggregated, not just transactions under a single contract.
Business Allocation Protocol Issues
The Business Allocation Protocol in the Joint Venture Agreement dated March 24, 2020, was deemed a related party transaction requiring minority shareholder approval. This protocol involved geographical and product allocation between Linde India and Praxair India without proper valuation or shareholder consent.
Tribunal's Comprehensive Analysis
Transaction Aggregation Ruling
The three-member tribunal, comprising Justice P.S. Dinesh Kumar (Presiding Officer), Ms. Meera Swarup (Technical Member), and Dr. Dheeraj Bhatnagar (Technical Member), unanimously ruled on the critical interpretation of materiality testing:
| Aspect | Tribunal Decision |
|---|---|
| Aggregation Scope | All transactions with related party in financial year |
| Contract Limitation | Rejected single-contract interpretation |
| Regulatory Compliance | LODR Regulations binding for listed entities |
| Shareholder Protection | Higher disclosure standards required |
Business Valuation Direction Upheld
The tribunal upheld SEBI's direction requiring NSE to appoint a registered valuer to assess the business foregone and received through geographical allocation. The ruling emphasized that business allocation constitutes "transfer of profit-making apparatus" requiring proper valuation and potential shareholder approval if materiality thresholds are exceeded.
Company's Failed Arguments
Linde India's legal team, led by Senior Advocate Janak Dwarkadas, presented several arguments that the tribunal rejected:
- Single Contract Theory: The company argued that only transactions under individual contracts should be aggregated for materiality testing
- Business Judgment Rule: Claims that business allocation decisions were protected management decisions
- Valuation Impracticality: Arguments that future business valuation was impossible or unnecessary
Historical Context and Shareholder Rejection
The tribunal noted that Linde India had initially sought omnibus approval from shareholders in its 85th AGM for related party transactions with Praxair India and the joint venture company. However, public shareholders rejected this proposal, after which the company changed its interpretation of regulatory requirements.
Regulatory Impact Assessment
| Impact Area | Company Status |
|---|---|
| Future RPT Testing | Must aggregate all transactions annually |
| Shareholder Approvals | Required if materiality threshold exceeded |
| Business Valuation | Ongoing NSE-appointed valuer assessment |
| Compliance Framework | Stricter LODR adherence mandatory |
Management Changes Amid Regulatory Challenges
The SAT dismissal comes alongside significant management changes, with CFO Neeraj Kumar Jumrani's resignation effective February 15, 2026. The company has clarified that the CFO's departure, announced on December 4, 2025, is unrelated to the tribunal's decision, emphasizing these are separate developments.
Looking Forward
The tribunal's ruling establishes important precedents for related party transaction compliance among listed entities. Linde India must now examine next steps regarding the order's impact on its financial and operational activities. The company faces ongoing valuation exercises and potential requirements for retrospective shareholder approvals if transaction values exceed prescribed thresholds.
The comprehensive 37-page tribunal order reinforces regulatory oversight of related party transactions, particularly in cases involving complex corporate structures and international parent companies. This decision will likely influence how other listed entities structure and approve related party transactions going forward.
Historical Stock Returns for Linde
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.08% | +1.14% | +0.38% | -9.80% | -5.23% | +541.59% |

































