Sanders cites poll showing 69% support for public AI ownership plan
Sen. Bernie Sanders cited a Verasight poll of 1,690 U.S. adults showing 69% support for his plan to give the public a 50% stake in AI companies via a sovereign wealth fund. The American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act aims to distribute AI gains broadly, countering concerns of wealth concentration. While some economists warn of potential job losses, political reactions vary, with support from the Trump administration for government stakes and criticism from tech leaders.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Sen. Bernie Sanders highlighted a poll on Monday indicating that 69% of Americans support his legislative proposal to grant the public a 50% ownership stake in the country's largest AI companies. The independent Senator from Vermont argued that the economic gains generated by artificial intelligence should benefit the broader public rather than remain concentrated among a small group of tech companies and investors. The proposal aims to establish an American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund to hold these ownership stakes.
The poll, conducted by research firm Verasight in June, surveyed 1,690 U.S. adults. It found that nearly seven in 10 respondents support requiring AI companies such as OpenAI and Anthropic to transfer half of their stock into a public sovereign wealth fund. Sanders shared the results on social media, stating that the American people understand AI must work for everyone, not just enrich a handful of Big Tech billionaires.
American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act
Sanders introduced the American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act in June. The legislation proposes creating a public fund that holds a 50% ownership stake in the nation's largest AI companies. This structure is designed to allow Americans to share in the industry's long-term financial gains. The bill is a response to concerns that the wealth generated by rapid advancements in AI technology is accruing disproportionately to corporate entities and high-net-worth investors.
Employment and Economic Impact
The proposal emerges amid growing concerns regarding AI's impact on employment. Goldman Sachs Senior Global Economist Joseph Briggs has estimated that roughly 15 million U.S. workers, or about 9% of the labor force, could lose jobs during a decade-long AI transition. While Briggs expects AI to create new jobs over time, the potential for significant displacement has fueled the debate over how to manage the economic transition.
Research firm Windfall Trust suggested that sovereign wealth funds could help governments invest in AI infrastructure and capture economic gains for citizens. However, the firm also cautioned that such funds may face difficult trade-offs between maximizing investment returns and advancing national AI priorities.
Political Reactions
The plan has drawn criticism from some technology and political figures. David Sacks, former White House AI and Crypto Czar, criticized the proposal. Ripple Chief Technology Officer David Schwartz argued that the plan amounts to an attack on free speech.
Conversely, in June, Vice President JD Vance stated that President Donald Trump supports government ownership stakes in major AI companies through a sovereign wealth fund-style model. Elon Musk has suggested that direct cash payments to Americans would be a better approach than acquiring equity stakes.
How might the proposed 50% ownership stake impact the ability of AI companies to raise future private capital?
What specific legal challenges could arise regarding the constitutionality of forcing private companies to transfer stock to the government?
How would the American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund balance the conflict between maximizing financial returns and enforcing government regulatory priorities?

































