Israel vows indefinite presence in Lebanon despite US-Iran peace deal
Israel vows to maintain its military presence in southern Lebanon indefinitely despite the new U.S.-Iran peace deal. Defense Minister Israel Katz warned of full-force retaliation if Iran attacks, while National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir rejected the agreement's validity for Israel. The stance follows reports of a heated exchange between President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over Israeli strikes in Beirut.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Israel has decided to maintain its military presence in southern Lebanon, where it is fighting the Iran-backed Hezbollah, despite the recent peace agreement between the U.S. and Iran. Defense Minister Israel Katz warned on Monday that if Iran were to attack Israel due to the events in Lebanon, Israel would retaliate “with full force.” He stated that Israel will not compromise on its security interests and vowed to continue staying in security zones in Lebanon, Syria, or Gaza “without any time limit.”
Security Stance and Coalition Response
While there was no immediate comment from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, members of his coalition stated that Israel will “not be bound” by the terms of the U.S.-Iran agreement. National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir rejected the agreement, arguing that it does not bind Israel and insisting the country would make its own security decisions. He claimed the deal fails to adequately protect Israeli security interests and argued against withdrawing from territory captured in Lebanon.
Diplomatic Reactions
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Israel must halt its military operations in Lebanon for the U.S.-backed peace deal to take effect. The peace agreement, announced by President Donald Trump, came a day after Trump warned Israel against further strikes in Lebanon, stating that such actions could jeopardize the ongoing peace process.
US-Israel Relations Strained
The situation has exacerbated tensions between the U.S. and Israeli leadership. Trump told Axios that he was caught off guard by an Israeli strike in Beirut and reacted angrily toward Netanyahu after being briefed by his advisers. “I was so pissed off. I let him know. He has no f***ing judgement. I let him know that,” Trump told the publication. Earlier, Vice President JD Vance had noted that the U.S. and Israel do not always share aligned interests, highlighting the reported strains between Trump and Netanyahu.
How might the U.S. leverage military aid or diplomatic support to pressure Israel into complying with the ceasefire terms?
What specific economic or military consequences could Iran face if it retaliates against Israel while the U.S. attempts to enforce the peace deal?
Will the rift between Trump and Netanyahu lead to a recalibration of U.S. policy regarding Israeli strikes in Syria or Gaza?

























