Blanche rejects pledge for DOJ independence from White House
Todd Blanche rejects pledging DOJ independence from the White House, stating he will consider President Trump's views while maintaining prosecutions proceed without fear or favor. He confirmed the rescission of a $1.8 billion anti-weaponization fund and defended U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro amid criticism from Trump.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Attorney General Todd Blanche said Sunday he would not pledge that the Justice Department always operates independently of the White House, arguing that President Donald Trump's views deserve consideration. Blanche insisted federal prosecutions would proceed "without fear or any sort of favor," despite rejecting calls to insulate law-enforcement decisions from political influence.
Blanche Rejects Pledge Of DOJ Independence
Blanche told NBC's "Meet the Press" that he would take the president's view on matters into consideration. When asked to pledge DOJ independence, he replied, "No, I'm not going to pledge that."
This position contrasts with post-Watergate norms designed to insulate enforcement decisions from political influence. The DOJ's Justice Manual states that safeguards governing White House contacts protect criminal and civil enforcement decisions from "partisan or other inappropriate influences."
Blanche, Trump's former personal criminal-defense lawyer, was sworn in last week following a 50-49 Senate confirmation. Republican Senators Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski joined Democrats in opposing him over DOJ independence concerns, while Senator Bill Cassidy supplied a decisive vote.
Blanche Says Trump Would Respect Legal Limits
Blanche rejected suggestions that Trump would pressure him to cross legal lines. "The president will never ask me to do something unethical or illegal," he said. He described the idea that Trump would demand illegal action as "completely a false narrative" and stated it "will not happen, and hasn't happened."
His confirmation fight intensified over Trump's proposed $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization" fund. Blanche formally rescinded the proposal before the Senate vote after negotiations with Republican holdouts. "I've said repeatedly it's dead. And he has also said it's dead," Blanche said. "There is no fund."
Pirro Dispute Tests Blanche’s Independence Argument
Blanche defended U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro after Trump criticized her decision to drop a Reflecting Pool vandalism case. Trump had urged Pirro to revisit the "hastily made" decision. "I absolutely support U.S. Attorney Pirro, as does President Trump," Blanche said, acknowledging Trump's frustration.
The episode offered an early test of Blanche's argument that presidential input need not dictate prosecutorial outcomes. In his first address to DOJ employees, Blanche promised to uphold the rule of law "without fear or favor" and encouraged internal disagreement.
Benzinga reached out to the White House for a statement on Blanche's interview comments but did not receive an immediate response.
How might Blanche's refusal to pledge DOJ independence impact investor confidence in the rule of law and regulatory stability for corporations facing federal scrutiny?
Could the precedent set by the Jeanine Pirro case encourage other U.S. Attorneys to face increased political pressure, potentially altering prosecution strategies in high-profile cases?
What are the potential legal challenges or congressional oversight measures that could emerge from Republican senators who opposed Blanche's confirmation due to independence concerns?

























